Validation and reproducibility of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Written Allergic Rhinitis Questionnaire for phone survey in children aged 6‒7 years

• Allergic Rhinitis (AR) is the most prevalent allergic disease in Brazil. • ISAAC stablished an epidemiological landmark in study of allergic diseases. • ISAAC AR Questionnaire by phone has high agreement with clinical diagnosis of AR. • ISAAC AR Questionnaire by phone discriminates children with and without AR. To validate and assess the reproducibility of the ISAAC Written Allergic Rhinitis Questionnaire (WARQ) for children aged between 6 and 7 years by telephone contact. Observational study through interviews with guardians of children aged 6–7 years using the ISAAC Allergic Rhinitis (AR) module questionnaire in three different phases separated by 2 weeks each: telephone interviews in the first and third contacts and face-to-face interviews, with the same guardian of telephone interviews, in the second contact. Reproducibility was estimated using the Kappa index and validation using the sensitivity and specificity coefficients. Data from 94 children (48 from the allergic rhinitis Control Group ‒ CG) were analyzed. Reproducibility showed perfect agreement (100%) for the question number 1 – Which refers to the symptoms of AR, ever: “Has your child ever had a problem with sneezing or a runny or a blocked nose when he/she did not have a cold or the flu?” and for the question number 2 – Which refers to current symptoms of AR: “In the past 12 months, has your child had a problem with sneezing or a runny or a blocked nose when he/she did not have a cold or the flu?” A strong agreement was also observed for the question number 3 (κ = 0.871) – it defines the presence of comorbidity of allergic rhinoconjuntivitis “In the past 12 months, has this nose problem been accompanied by itchy-watery eyes?” The validation showed high specificity (≥76.7%) and sensitivity (≥98%) for all questions, except for the ones related to seasonality and intensity of symptoms. Our results showed that the ISAAC AR module questionnaire by telephone interviews has good reproducibility and high agreement with the clinical diagnosis of AR. It may be an appropriate alternative tool in epidemiological studies of childhood AR, especially in periods of social isolation, such as Coronavirus pandemic. Cohort Study. Level IV

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101531
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation and reproducibility of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Written Allergic Rhinitis Questionnaire for phone survey in children aged 6‒7 years

Antônio José Lêdo Alves da Cunha, Priscilla Campos, Solange Oliveira Rodrigues Valle, Fábio Chigres Kuschnir et al.
3 citations
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
1.15
article

Validation and reproducibility of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Written Allergic Rhinitis Questionnaire for phone survey in children aged 6‒7 years

Antônio José Lêdo Alves da Cunha, Priscilla Campos, Solange Oliveira Rodrigues Valle, Fábio Chigres Kuschnir, Dirceu Solé
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Allergic Rhinitis (AR) is the most prevalent allergic disease in Brazil. • ISAAC stablished an epidemiological landmark in study of allergic diseases. • ISAAC AR Questionnaire by phone has high agreement with clinical diagnosis of AR. • ISAAC AR Questionnaire by phone discriminates children with and without AR. To validate and assess the reproducibility of the ISAAC Written Allergic Rhinitis Questionnaire (WARQ) for children aged between 6 and 7 years by telephone contact. Observational study through interviews with guardians of children aged 6–7 years using the ISAAC Allergic Rhinitis (AR) module questionnaire in three different phases separated by 2 weeks each: telephone interviews in the first and third contacts and face-to-face interviews, with the same guardian of telephone interviews, in the second contact. Reproducibility was estimated using the Kappa index and validation using the sensitivity and specificity coefficients. Data from 94 children (48 from the allergic rhinitis Control Group ‒ CG) were analyzed. Reproducibility showed perfect agreement (100%) for the question number 1 – Which refers to the symptoms of AR, ever: “Has your child ever had a problem with sneezing or a runny or a blocked nose when he/she did not have a cold or the flu?” and for the question number 2 – Which refers to current symptoms of AR: “In the past 12 months, has your child had a problem with sneezing or a runny or a blocked nose when he/she did not have a cold or the flu?” A strong agreement was also observed for the question number 3 (κ = 0.871) – it defines the presence of comorbidity of allergic rhinoconjuntivitis “In the past 12 months, has this nose problem been accompanied by itchy-watery eyes?” The validation showed high specificity (≥76.7%) and sensitivity (≥98%) for all questions, except for the ones related to seasonality and intensity of symptoms. Our results showed that the ISAAC AR module questionnaire by telephone interviews has good reproducibility and high agreement with the clinical diagnosis of AR. It may be an appropriate alternative tool in epidemiological studies of childhood AR, especially in periods of social isolation, such as Coronavirus pandemic. Cohort Study. Level IV

Brazilian Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyVol. 91(2)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.