Opportunities and barriers for promoting biodiversity in Danish beef production

Grazing at near-natural stocking rates is increasingly rare, whereas abandonment and overgrazing is common, despite both leading to loss of threatened species. Here, we evaluate a biodiversity-promotion strategy of a beef-producing company involving livestock grazing for conservation. Using field surveys, a national biodiversity map, and farmer interviews, we evaluate the conservation potential of farmers committing to a conservation grazing scheme. Most farmers practiced summer grazing, and-contrary to their pledge-primarily grazed areas of low conservation value, and with stocking rates far above carrying capacity. We conclude that a conservation grazing beef brand will only have real value for threatened species if committed to, and held accountable to, a scientifically informed grazing scheme. Our results point to rural traditions, legal regulations, and economic incentives as factors obstructing of a beneficial grazing practice. Hence, the results of this study call for a critical and scientifically informed approach to future land-sharing policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111422
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opportunities and barriers for promoting biodiversity in Danish beef production

Rasmus Ejrnæs, Linda M. Dumke, Jesper Erenskjold Moeslund, Lars Dalby et al.
3 citations
iScience
Forest Management and Policy
0.85
article

Opportunities and barriers for promoting biodiversity in Danish beef production

Rasmus Ejrnæs, Linda M. Dumke, Jesper Erenskjold Moeslund, Lars Dalby, Hans Henrik Bruun, Camilla Fløjgaard, Lise Bruun, Jesper Bladt, Ditte Dalsgaard Ejrnæs, Skjold Alsted Søndergaard
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Grazing at near-natural stocking rates is increasingly rare, whereas abandonment and overgrazing is common, despite both leading to loss of threatened species. Here, we evaluate a biodiversity-promotion strategy of a beef-producing company involving livestock grazing for conservation. Using field surveys, a national biodiversity map, and farmer interviews, we evaluate the conservation potential of farmers committing to a conservation grazing scheme. Most farmers practiced summer grazing, and-contrary to their pledge-primarily grazed areas of low conservation value, and with stocking rates far above carrying capacity. We conclude that a conservation grazing beef brand will only have real value for threatened species if committed to, and held accountable to, a scientifically informed grazing scheme. Our results point to rural traditions, legal regulations, and economic incentives as factors obstructing of a beneficial grazing practice. Hence, the results of this study call for a critical and scientifically informed approach to future land-sharing policies.

iScienceVol. 27(12)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Aarhus University (DK), Gentofte Hospital (DK), Vejle Sygehus (DK)
Aarhus Universitet
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Forest Management and Policy
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.