An iterative approach for estimating domain-specific cognitive abilities from large scale online cognitive data

Abstract Online cognitive tasks are gaining traction as scalable and cost-effective alternatives to traditional supervised assessments. However, variability in peoples’ home devices, visual and motor abilities, and speed-accuracy biases confound the specificity with which online tasks can measure cognitive abilities. To address these limitations, we developed IDoCT (Iterative Decomposition of Cognitive Tasks), a method for estimating domain-specific cognitive abilities and trial-difficulty scales from task performance timecourses in a data-driven manner while accounting for device and visuomotor latencies, unspecific cognitive processes and speed-accuracy trade-offs. IDoCT can operate with any computerised task where cognitive difficulty varies across trials. Using data from 388,757 adults, we show that IDoCT successfully dissociates cognitive abilities from these confounding factors. The resultant cognitive scores exhibit stronger dissociation of psychometric factors, improved cross-participants distributions, and meaningful demographic’s associations. We propose that IDoCT can enhance the precision of online cognitive assessments, especially in large scale clinical and research applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01327-x
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Cognitive Functions and Memory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An iterative approach for estimating domain-specific cognitive abilities from large scale online cognitive data

William R. Trender, Adam Hampshire, Valentina Giunchiglia, Annalaura Lerede et al.
5 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Cognitive Functions and Memory
2.54
article

An iterative approach for estimating domain-specific cognitive abilities from large scale online cognitive data

William R. Trender, Adam Hampshire, Valentina Giunchiglia, Annalaura Lerede, Dragos C. Gruia, Peter John Hellyer
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Online cognitive tasks are gaining traction as scalable and cost-effective alternatives to traditional supervised assessments. However, variability in peoples’ home devices, visual and motor abilities, and speed-accuracy biases confound the specificity with which online tasks can measure cognitive abilities. To address these limitations, we developed IDoCT (Iterative Decomposition of Cognitive Tasks), a method for estimating domain-specific cognitive abilities and trial-difficulty scales from task performance timecourses in a data-driven manner while accounting for device and visuomotor latencies, unspecific cognitive processes and speed-accuracy trade-offs. IDoCT can operate with any computerised task where cognitive difficulty varies across trials. Using data from 388,757 adults, we show that IDoCT successfully dissociates cognitive abilities from these confounding factors. The resultant cognitive scores exhibit stronger dissociation of psychometric factors, improved cross-participants distributions, and meaningful demographic’s associations. We propose that IDoCT can enhance the precision of online cognitive assessments, especially in large scale clinical and research applications.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 7(1)
Harvard University (US), Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB), King's College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Imperial College London, King's College London, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cognitive Functions and Memory
2.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.