I'm Not Feeling It: The Role of Affective Diversity in Risk Management and Team Performance

ABSTRACT Team performance is contingent on nuanced approaches to risk management—demanding both risky and cautious strategic orientations. However, research surrounding how teams navigate this balance is limited. We argue that both positive and negative affective diversity can aid team performance, through affective diversity's impact on the team's risky and cautious behaviors. Furthermore, we argue that team trait regulatory focus strengthens these relationships. Using a controlled laboratory setting with 58 teams in a complex, uncertain team task that requires both risky and cautious strategies for successful performance, results indicate that positive affective diversity relates to team performance through promoting risky behavior, while negative affective diversity relates to team performance through promoting cautious behavior. Teams high in trait prevention‐focus are more attuned to the information signals in teams with negative affective diversity, but we did not find that promotion focus impacted outcomes of positive affective diversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Resource Management
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22265
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

I'm Not Feeling It: The Role of Affective Diversity in Risk Management and Team Performance

Rebecca L. Mitchell, Rachel Hahn, Daniel J. Griffin, John R. Hollenbeck et al.
Human Resource Management
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

I'm Not Feeling It: The Role of Affective Diversity in Risk Management and Team Performance

Rebecca L. Mitchell, Rachel Hahn, Daniel J. Griffin, John R. Hollenbeck, Nikhil Awasty
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Team performance is contingent on nuanced approaches to risk management—demanding both risky and cautious strategic orientations. However, research surrounding how teams navigate this balance is limited. We argue that both positive and negative affective diversity can aid team performance, through affective diversity's impact on the team's risky and cautious behaviors. Furthermore, we argue that team trait regulatory focus strengthens these relationships. Using a controlled laboratory setting with 58 teams in a complex, uncertain team task that requires both risky and cautious strategies for successful performance, results indicate that positive affective diversity relates to team performance through promoting risky behavior, while negative affective diversity relates to team performance through promoting cautious behavior. Teams high in trait prevention‐focus are more attuned to the information signals in teams with negative affective diversity, but we did not find that promotion focus impacted outcomes of positive affective diversity.

Human Resource ManagementVol. 64(2)
University of New Hampshire (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), University of South Florida (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

I'm Not Feeling It: The Role of Affective Diversity in Risk Management and Team Performance — Rebecca L. Mitchell, Rachel Hahn, et al. · Human Resource Management (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS