Fetal Heart Rate and Amniotic Fluid Volume Measurements with a Home Ultrasound Device

Pulsenmore ES is a self-scanning ultrasound (US) system for remote fetal assessment. It comprises a handheld transducer that serves as a smartphone cradle coupled with an application and clinician's web-viewer dashboard. Recently, a novel capability was added to the system allowing offline fetal heart rate (FHR) and maximal vertical pocket (MVP) measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate these tools for usability and accuracy.A prospective, non-randomized, non-blinded clinical study design was used. Pulsenmore ES scans were obtained by non-professional laypersons in app-guided (AG) mode (user follows video tutorials in the application) or clinician-guided (CG) mode (user is guided by a health care professional in a real-time telemedicine visit). The scans were stored on a cloud for later interpretation by a health care professional. Each self-scan was immediately followed by a standard US scan performed by a clinician. The asynchronous FHR and MVP measurements made on the AG and CG scans through the designated dashboard were analyzed and compared with the real-time, in-clinic (INC) measurements.The cohort included 28 women. Rates of successful utilization of the Pulsenmore tool for measurement of FHR were 84.7 ± 11.24% of scans made in AG mode and 96.3 ± 6.35% of scans made in CG mode. Corresponding values for MVP were 91.7 ± 2.31% and 95.0 ± 1.73%. FHR accuracy (difference from INC values) was 10.8 ± 7.5 beats per minute (bpm; 7.2%) in AG mode and 5.8 ± 5.1 bpm (4%) in CG mode. MVP accuracy was 1.3 ± 1.4 cm (22%) and 0.9 ± 0.8 cm (14%), respectively. Sensitivity (87.5% and 100% in AG and CG modes, respectively) and specificity (95% and 95.5% in AG and CG modes, respectively) were established for MVP.FHR and MVP measurements obtained from scans captured by the self-operated Pulsenmore ES ultrasound platform are highly accurate and reliable for clinical use relative to standard INC measurements. · Pulsenmore ES is a self-scanning US system for remote fetal assessment.. · FHR and MVP can be accurately and remotely measured from home.. · Home US can play a critical role in remote antenatal surveillance..

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2469-0887
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fetal Heart Rate and Amniotic Fluid Volume Measurements with a Home Ultrasound Device

Tomer Sela, Eran Hadar, Or Lee Rak, Anat Pardo et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Perinatology
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
1.11
article

Fetal Heart Rate and Amniotic Fluid Volume Measurements with a Home Ultrasound Device

Tomer Sela, Eran Hadar, Or Lee Rak, Anat Pardo, Shiri Barbash‐Hazan, Hadas Zafrir danieli, Shir Nahum Fridland, Anat Shmueli, Emilie Klochendler Frishman, Asnat Walfisch, Arnon Wiznitzer, Leor Wolff
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Pulsenmore ES is a self-scanning ultrasound (US) system for remote fetal assessment. It comprises a handheld transducer that serves as a smartphone cradle coupled with an application and clinician's web-viewer dashboard. Recently, a novel capability was added to the system allowing offline fetal heart rate (FHR) and maximal vertical pocket (MVP) measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate these tools for usability and accuracy.A prospective, non-randomized, non-blinded clinical study design was used. Pulsenmore ES scans were obtained by non-professional laypersons in app-guided (AG) mode (user follows video tutorials in the application) or clinician-guided (CG) mode (user is guided by a health care professional in a real-time telemedicine visit). The scans were stored on a cloud for later interpretation by a health care professional. Each self-scan was immediately followed by a standard US scan performed by a clinician. The asynchronous FHR and MVP measurements made on the AG and CG scans through the designated dashboard were analyzed and compared with the real-time, in-clinic (INC) measurements.The cohort included 28 women. Rates of successful utilization of the Pulsenmore tool for measurement of FHR were 84.7 ± 11.24% of scans made in AG mode and 96.3 ± 6.35% of scans made in CG mode. Corresponding values for MVP were 91.7 ± 2.31% and 95.0 ± 1.73%. FHR accuracy (difference from INC values) was 10.8 ± 7.5 beats per minute (bpm; 7.2%) in AG mode and 5.8 ± 5.1 bpm (4%) in CG mode. MVP accuracy was 1.3 ± 1.4 cm (22%) and 0.9 ± 0.8 cm (14%), respectively. Sensitivity (87.5% and 100% in AG and CG modes, respectively) and specificity (95% and 95.5% in AG and CG modes, respectively) were established for MVP.FHR and MVP measurements obtained from scans captured by the self-operated Pulsenmore ES ultrasound platform are highly accurate and reliable for clinical use relative to standard INC measurements. · Pulsenmore ES is a self-scanning US system for remote fetal assessment.. · FHR and MVP can be accurately and remotely measured from home.. · Home US can play a critical role in remote antenatal surveillance..

American Journal of PerinatologyVol. 42(09)
Tel Aviv University (IL), Rabin Medical Center (IL), Clalit Health Services (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.