Recognised cognitive biases: How far do they explain transport behaviour?

Human beings think in a slow, careful and logical way for important and complex issues and a fast, intuitive way for most decisions. The logical mechanism takes too much effort for the myriad of daily decisions. For example, logical thinking can be combined only with walking slowly not quickly. Hence behavioural approaches that assume humans make decisions logically are contrary to the evidence. Intuitive thinking is open to perceptual errors called ‘cognitive biases’. Cognitive biases are common and wide spread. In this paper we review salient cognitive biases that effect decision-making around transport using Dror's eight sources of cognitive bias described in three categories: (i) case specific biases (to do with the data or knowledge itself); (ii) environment, culture and experience bias, (between the data and the person acting upon the data), and; (iii) bias originating from human nature, (the cognitive make-up of the human brain shared across all people, regardless of the specific case, data or knowledge or the specific person doing the analysis). These influence people's transport behaviour and the decisions of policy makers and engineers. Of especial importance are loss aversion (valuing something you have about twice as highly as you would value it if you were considering acquiring it); various other biases favouring the status quo; and various errors of risk perception. We conclude by suggesting more education and training and multi sectoral and multidisciplinary working is needed to help develop awareness of bias and identifying susceptibility to bias and how to overcome them where possible. This description is an expansion of a table contained in Health on the Move 3:the Reviews (Mindell and Watkins, 2024) • Over 200 cognitive biases (predictable errors of intuitive thought) have been recognised. • This paper identifies 40 cognitive biases which could influence transport behaviour. • Cognitive biases affect researchers, academics and policy makers. • These include cognitive biases which predispose to continuation of the status quo. • As cognitive biases are predictable we can plan for them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Transport & Health
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2024.101941
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recognised cognitive biases: How far do they explain transport behaviour?

Stephen John Watkins, Charles Musselwhite
7 citations
Journal of Transport & Health
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
3.75
article

Recognised cognitive biases: How far do they explain transport behaviour?

Stephen John Watkins, Charles Musselwhite
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Human beings think in a slow, careful and logical way for important and complex issues and a fast, intuitive way for most decisions. The logical mechanism takes too much effort for the myriad of daily decisions. For example, logical thinking can be combined only with walking slowly not quickly. Hence behavioural approaches that assume humans make decisions logically are contrary to the evidence. Intuitive thinking is open to perceptual errors called ‘cognitive biases’. Cognitive biases are common and wide spread. In this paper we review salient cognitive biases that effect decision-making around transport using Dror's eight sources of cognitive bias described in three categories: (i) case specific biases (to do with the data or knowledge itself); (ii) environment, culture and experience bias, (between the data and the person acting upon the data), and; (iii) bias originating from human nature, (the cognitive make-up of the human brain shared across all people, regardless of the specific case, data or knowledge or the specific person doing the analysis). These influence people's transport behaviour and the decisions of policy makers and engineers. Of especial importance are loss aversion (valuing something you have about twice as highly as you would value it if you were considering acquiring it); various other biases favouring the status quo; and various errors of risk perception. We conclude by suggesting more education and training and multi sectoral and multidisciplinary working is needed to help develop awareness of bias and identifying susceptibility to bias and how to overcome them where possible. This description is an expansion of a table contained in Health on the Move 3:the Reviews (Mindell and Watkins, 2024) • Over 200 cognitive biases (predictable errors of intuitive thought) have been recognised. • This paper identifies 40 cognitive biases which could influence transport behaviour. • Cognitive biases affect researchers, academics and policy makers. • These include cognitive biases which predispose to continuation of the status quo. • As cognitive biases are predictable we can plan for them.

Journal of Transport & HealthVol. 40
Aberystwyth University (GB), Transport for London (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
3.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.