Towards a speech-gesture profile of discourse markers: The case of ‘I mean’

• We illustrate a multimodal corpus pragmatic approach to studying discourse markers. • We establish a speech-gesture functional profile of ‘I mean’. • ‘I mean’ mainly functions to mark speech ‘editing’ and ‘introducing modifications’. • Gestures co-occurring with ‘I mean’ mainly perform the function of presenting. • Speech and gesture functions of ‘I mean’ are in multimodal and pragmatic alignment. Our study aims to develop a new corpus pragmatic approach for exploring the gesture patterns (i.e. functions and forms) co-occurring with the discourse marker ‘I mean’, including a comparison with previous research on another discourse marker (i.e. ‘you know’). We selected and analysed 246 instances of ‘I mean’ and 88 gestures that co-occur with these instances from the supervisory sub-corpus of the Nottingham Multimodal Corpus (654 mins, 118,508 words). A functional framework for the analysis of speech functions was developed based on the emerging speech patterns surrounding ‘I mean’. This included three functions: ‘editing’, ‘introducing modifications’ and ‘ending modifications’. The co-occurring gestures were categorised into four functional types: pragmatic, referential, beat and deictic gestures. The main results of the speech analysis of ‘I mean’ suggest that ‘I mean’ tends to be used predominantly as a marker of ‘editing’ (163 instances, 66.26%) and ‘introducing modifications’ (80 instances, 32.52%), both of which emphasise the speaker’s intention to present additional information. These findings largely resemble those of ‘you know’; however, the functions of ‘you know’ are more varied. The analysis of the gesture patterns co-occurring with ‘I mean’ shows that both the ‘editing’ and ‘introducing modifications’ functions tend to co-occur with pragmatic gestures that serve a similar function of presenting and offering information (e.g., open hand palm up and open hand palm oblique gestures), mirroring the results of ‘you know’. These results suggest a functional coordination between discourse markers and gestures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lingua
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103836
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a speech-gesture profile of discourse markers: The case of ‘I mean’

Yaoyao Chen, Svenja Adolphs, Dawn Knight
2 citations
Lingua
Hearing Impairment and Communication
1.58
article

Towards a speech-gesture profile of discourse markers: The case of ‘I mean’

Yaoyao Chen, Svenja Adolphs, Dawn Knight
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• We illustrate a multimodal corpus pragmatic approach to studying discourse markers. • We establish a speech-gesture functional profile of ‘I mean’. • ‘I mean’ mainly functions to mark speech ‘editing’ and ‘introducing modifications’. • Gestures co-occurring with ‘I mean’ mainly perform the function of presenting. • Speech and gesture functions of ‘I mean’ are in multimodal and pragmatic alignment. Our study aims to develop a new corpus pragmatic approach for exploring the gesture patterns (i.e. functions and forms) co-occurring with the discourse marker ‘I mean’, including a comparison with previous research on another discourse marker (i.e. ‘you know’). We selected and analysed 246 instances of ‘I mean’ and 88 gestures that co-occur with these instances from the supervisory sub-corpus of the Nottingham Multimodal Corpus (654 mins, 118,508 words). A functional framework for the analysis of speech functions was developed based on the emerging speech patterns surrounding ‘I mean’. This included three functions: ‘editing’, ‘introducing modifications’ and ‘ending modifications’. The co-occurring gestures were categorised into four functional types: pragmatic, referential, beat and deictic gestures. The main results of the speech analysis of ‘I mean’ suggest that ‘I mean’ tends to be used predominantly as a marker of ‘editing’ (163 instances, 66.26%) and ‘introducing modifications’ (80 instances, 32.52%), both of which emphasise the speaker’s intention to present additional information. These findings largely resemble those of ‘you know’; however, the functions of ‘you know’ are more varied. The analysis of the gesture patterns co-occurring with ‘I mean’ shows that both the ‘editing’ and ‘introducing modifications’ functions tend to co-occur with pragmatic gestures that serve a similar function of presenting and offering information (e.g., open hand palm up and open hand palm oblique gestures), mirroring the results of ‘you know’. These results suggest a functional coordination between discourse markers and gestures.

LinguaVol. 312
Macau University of Science and Technology (MO), University of Nottingham (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Macau University of Science and Technology, Economic and Social Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
1.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.