COVID-19 as a disruption to China’s ‘tenure neutrality’ initiative? State-accentuated tenure inequality and rental sector precarity during the pandemic

In early 2020, while China’s centralised governance response rapidly brought COVID-19 under control, tenure inequality and private rental sector precarity continued unabated. Drawing on stakeholder interviews in Shanghai, nation-wide renter complaints analysis, and a review of government pandemic reactions, this paper reveals the stark contrast between the neglect of renters’ rights and stringent public health measures. Under this prevailing governance model, renters’ wellbeing–including the right to secure occupancy–was effectively over-ridden during the COVID-19 emergency. This approach will have further degraded the reputation and appeal of rental tenure, detracting from state aspirations for greater equality between renting and owner-occupation–the Chinese Government’s ‘tenure neutrality’ initiative, ongoing since 2017. The study highlights how pandemic responses exacerbated existing housing inequalities and argues for proactive government commitments to protect marginalised populations’ secure occupancy and avoid accentuating tenure inequality during crisis periods.<br>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Housing Studies
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2024.2428742
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COVID-19 as a disruption to China’s ‘tenure neutrality’ initiative? State-accentuated tenure inequality and rental sector precarity during the pandemic

Hal Pawson, Jin Zhu
3 citations
Housing Studies
Employment and Welfare Studies
2.55
article

COVID-19 as a disruption to China’s ‘tenure neutrality’ initiative? State-accentuated tenure inequality and rental sector precarity during the pandemic

Hal Pawson, Jin Zhu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In early 2020, while China’s centralised governance response rapidly brought COVID-19 under control, tenure inequality and private rental sector precarity continued unabated. Drawing on stakeholder interviews in Shanghai, nation-wide renter complaints analysis, and a review of government pandemic reactions, this paper reveals the stark contrast between the neglect of renters’ rights and stringent public health measures. Under this prevailing governance model, renters’ wellbeing–including the right to secure occupancy–was effectively over-ridden during the COVID-19 emergency. This approach will have further degraded the reputation and appeal of rental tenure, detracting from state aspirations for greater equality between renting and owner-occupation–the Chinese Government’s ‘tenure neutrality’ initiative, ongoing since 2017. The study highlights how pandemic responses exacerbated existing housing inequalities and argues for proactive government commitments to protect marginalised populations’ secure occupancy and avoid accentuating tenure inequality during crisis periods.<br>

Housing StudiesVol. 40(4)
Urban Institute (US), UNSW Sydney (AU), University of Hong Kong (HK)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Employment and Welfare Studies
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.