Standard Approaches to XPS and AES Quantification—A Summary of ISO 18118:2024 on the Use of Relative Sensitivity Factors

ABSTRACT Quantitative analysis of electron spectroscopy data from techniques such as Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) typically requires the use of relative sensitivity factors (RSFs). Virtually, all routine XPS experiments attempt to turn peak intensities into elemental or chemical compositions using RSFs. The comparability and reproducibility of surface chemical analysis by electron spectroscopies therefore require the standardisation of RSFs and their use. RSFs may be determined either from theoretical calculations based on photo‐ionisation cross‐sections or empirically through direct measurement of homogeneous reference samples of known composition. The accurate use of sensitivity factors, even empirically determined RSFs, requires accounting for the effect of material differences on relative intensities, the so‐called ‘matrix effects’. ISO 18118:2024 is the most recently revised version of the ISO standard for the use and determination of empirical RSFs for quantitative analysis of homogeneous materials by AES and XPS. This article provides a summary of the new, updated standard and the methods described therein, noting in particular the revisions made since the previous edition, ISO 18118:2015.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surface and Interface Analysis
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.7371
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Standard Approaches to XPS and AES Quantification—A Summary of ISO 18118:2024 on the Use of Relative Sensitivity Factors

Justin M. Gorham, David J. H. Cant, Charles A. Clifford, Alexander G. Shard
3 citations
Surface and Interface Analysis
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
0.54
article

Standard Approaches to XPS and AES Quantification—A Summary of ISO 18118:2024 on the Use of Relative Sensitivity Factors

Justin M. Gorham, David J. H. Cant, Charles A. Clifford, Alexander G. Shard
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Quantitative analysis of electron spectroscopy data from techniques such as Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) typically requires the use of relative sensitivity factors (RSFs). Virtually, all routine XPS experiments attempt to turn peak intensities into elemental or chemical compositions using RSFs. The comparability and reproducibility of surface chemical analysis by electron spectroscopies therefore require the standardisation of RSFs and their use. RSFs may be determined either from theoretical calculations based on photo‐ionisation cross‐sections or empirically through direct measurement of homogeneous reference samples of known composition. The accurate use of sensitivity factors, even empirically determined RSFs, requires accounting for the effect of material differences on relative intensities, the so‐called ‘matrix effects’. ISO 18118:2024 is the most recently revised version of the ISO standard for the use and determination of empirical RSFs for quantitative analysis of homogeneous materials by AES and XPS. This article provides a summary of the new, updated standard and the methods described therein, noting in particular the revisions made since the previous edition, ISO 18118:2015.

Surface and Interface AnalysisVol. 57(2)
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US), National Physical Laboratory (GB), Material Measurement Laboratory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.