Modular design workflow for 3D printable bioresorbable patient-specific bone scaffolds: extended features and clinical validation

A previously in-house developed patient-specific scaffold design workflow was extended with new features to overcome several limitations and to broaden its adaptability to diverse bone defects, thereby enhancing its fit for routine clinical use. It was applied to three clinical cases for further validation. A virtual surgical resection tool was developed to remove regions of the bone defect models. The minor cavity fill module enabled the generation of scaffold designs with smooth external surfaces and the segmental defect fill module allowed a versatile method to fill a segmental defect cavity. The boundary representation method based surgical approach module in the original workflow was redeveloped to use functional representation, eliminating previously seen resolution dependant artefacts. Lastly, a method to overlay the scaffold designs on computed tomography images of the defect for design verification by the surgeon was introduced. The extended workflow was applied to two ongoing clinical case studies of a complex bilateral femoral defect and a humerus defect, and also to a case of a large volume craniomaxillofacial defect. It was able to successfully generate scaffolds without any obstructions to their surgical insertion which was verified by digital examination as well as using physical 3D printed models. All produced surface meshes were free from 3D printing mesh errors. The scaffolds designed for the ongoing cases were 3D printed and successfully surgically implanted, providing confidence in the extended modular workflow's ability to be applied to a broad range of diverse clinical cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1404481
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modular design workflow for 3D printable bioresorbable patient-specific bone scaffolds: extended features and clinical validation

Dietmar W. Hutmacher, Heide Delbrück, Frank Hildebrand, Prasad Yarlagadda et al.
3 citations
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
0.55
article

Modular design workflow for 3D printable bioresorbable patient-specific bone scaffolds: extended features and clinical validation

Dietmar W. Hutmacher, Heide Delbrück, Frank Hildebrand, Prasad Yarlagadda, Marie‐Luise Wille, J. Paige Little, Beat Schmutz, Buddhi Herath, Markus Laubach, Sinduja Suresh
article en
3 citations

Abstract

A previously in-house developed patient-specific scaffold design workflow was extended with new features to overcome several limitations and to broaden its adaptability to diverse bone defects, thereby enhancing its fit for routine clinical use. It was applied to three clinical cases for further validation. A virtual surgical resection tool was developed to remove regions of the bone defect models. The minor cavity fill module enabled the generation of scaffold designs with smooth external surfaces and the segmental defect fill module allowed a versatile method to fill a segmental defect cavity. The boundary representation method based surgical approach module in the original workflow was redeveloped to use functional representation, eliminating previously seen resolution dependant artefacts. Lastly, a method to overlay the scaffold designs on computed tomography images of the defect for design verification by the surgeon was introduced. The extended workflow was applied to two ongoing clinical case studies of a complex bilateral femoral defect and a humerus defect, and also to a case of a large volume craniomaxillofacial defect. It was able to successfully generate scaffolds without any obstructions to their surgical insertion which was verified by digital examination as well as using physical 3D printed models. All produced surface meshes were free from 3D printing mesh errors. The scaffolds designed for the ongoing cases were 3D printed and successfully surgically implanted, providing confidence in the extended modular workflow's ability to be applied to a broad range of diverse clinical cases.

Frontiers in Bioengineering and BiotechnologyVol. 12
Australian Research Council (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), LMU Klinikum (DE), Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.