Toward Ontological Alignment: Coordinating Student Ideas with the Representational System of a Computational Modeling Unit for Science Learning

Computational modeling tools present unique opportunities and challenges for student learning. Each tool has a representational system that impacts the kinds of explorations students engage in. Inquiry aligned with a tool’s representational system can support more productive engagement toward target learning goals. However, little research has examined how teachers can make visible the ways students’ ideas about a phenomenon can be expressed and explored within a tool’s representational system. In this paper, we elaborate on the construct of ontological alignment—that is, identifying and leveraging points of resonance between students’ existing ideas and the representational system of a tool. Using interaction analysis, we identify alignment practices adopted by a science teacher and her students in a computational agent-based modeling unit. Specifically, we describe three practices: (1) Elevating student ideas relevant to the tool’s representational system; (2) Exploring and testing links between students’ conceptual and computational models; and (3) Drawing on evidence resonant with the tool’s representational system to differentiate between theories. Finally, we discuss the pedagogical value of ontological alignment as a way to leverage students’ ideas in alignment with a tool’s representational system and suggest the presented practices as exemplary ways to support students’ computational modeling for science learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition and Instruction
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2024.2427400
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward Ontological Alignment: Coordinating Student Ideas with the Representational System of a Computational Modeling Unit for Science Learning

Adelmo Eloy, Michelle Hoda Wilkerson, Paulo Blikstein, Tamar Fuhrmann et al.
1 citations
Cognition and Instruction
Teaching and Learning Programming
0.41
article

Toward Ontological Alignment: Coordinating Student Ideas with the Representational System of a Computational Modeling Unit for Science Learning

Adelmo Eloy, Michelle Hoda Wilkerson, Paulo Blikstein, Tamar Fuhrmann, Leah F. Rosenbaum, Aditi Wagh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Computational modeling tools present unique opportunities and challenges for student learning. Each tool has a representational system that impacts the kinds of explorations students engage in. Inquiry aligned with a tool’s representational system can support more productive engagement toward target learning goals. However, little research has examined how teachers can make visible the ways students’ ideas about a phenomenon can be expressed and explored within a tool’s representational system. In this paper, we elaborate on the construct of ontological alignment—that is, identifying and leveraging points of resonance between students’ existing ideas and the representational system of a tool. Using interaction analysis, we identify alignment practices adopted by a science teacher and her students in a computational agent-based modeling unit. Specifically, we describe three practices: (1) Elevating student ideas relevant to the tool’s representational system; (2) Exploring and testing links between students’ conceptual and computational models; and (3) Drawing on evidence resonant with the tool’s representational system to differentiate between theories. Finally, we discuss the pedagogical value of ontological alignment as a way to leverage students’ ideas in alignment with a tool’s representational system and suggest the presented practices as exemplary ways to support students’ computational modeling for science learning.

Cognition and InstructionVol. 43(1-2)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Columbia University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Teaching and Learning Programming
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.