Reading Cards: Chinese Students’ Rationales for Their Language-related Epistemic Beliefs

Studies on epistemic beliefs in L2 research are in a nascent stage. Acknowledging deeply rooted and complex intersections between prevalent cultural norms within a society, individually held beliefs, and mutually shared opinions among members of a social group, this Q methodological study explored Chinese university students’ rationales for holding particular language-related epistemic beliefs. Twenty students learning English as a foreign language participated in post Q-sorting interviews, where they explained the rationales for holding certain sets of beliefs about knowing and learning the English language. We analyzed the data using Card Content Analysis (CCA), a particularly suitable approach for the Q methodology. The findings revealed that the students held fairly sophisticated epistemic beliefs, and these beliefs were culturally rooted. The students placed a high premium on making a conscientious effort to learn English; they prioritized commitment and perseverance over having a special talent for learning languages. The respondents also believed that English, as any language, is evolving over time. Notably, while respecting their language instructors, the students realized that teachers, or even people for whom English is the mother tongue, might occasionally make linguistic errors. Several students stated that there are many sources from which one can learn English, and they also asserted the importance of being able to gage the veracity of the linguistic information one receives. The article concludes by drawing some pedagogical implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241297443
Primary Topic
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reading Cards: Chinese Students’ Rationales for Their Language-related Epistemic Beliefs

Larisa Nikitina, Yanyan Wang
SAGE Open
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
article

Reading Cards: Chinese Students’ Rationales for Their Language-related Epistemic Beliefs

Larisa Nikitina, Yanyan Wang
article en

Abstract

Studies on epistemic beliefs in L2 research are in a nascent stage. Acknowledging deeply rooted and complex intersections between prevalent cultural norms within a society, individually held beliefs, and mutually shared opinions among members of a social group, this Q methodological study explored Chinese university students’ rationales for holding particular language-related epistemic beliefs. Twenty students learning English as a foreign language participated in post Q-sorting interviews, where they explained the rationales for holding certain sets of beliefs about knowing and learning the English language. We analyzed the data using Card Content Analysis (CCA), a particularly suitable approach for the Q methodology. The findings revealed that the students held fairly sophisticated epistemic beliefs, and these beliefs were culturally rooted. The students placed a high premium on making a conscientious effort to learn English; they prioritized commitment and perseverance over having a special talent for learning languages. The respondents also believed that English, as any language, is evolving over time. Notably, while respecting their language instructors, the students realized that teachers, or even people for whom English is the mother tongue, might occasionally make linguistic errors. Several students stated that there are many sources from which one can learn English, and they also asserted the importance of being able to gage the veracity of the linguistic information one receives. The article concludes by drawing some pedagogical implications.

SAGE OpenVol. 14(4)
Chifeng University (CN), University of Malaya (MY)
Institute of Research Management and Services, University of Malaya
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reading Cards: Chinese Students’ Rationales for Their Language-related Epistemic Beliefs — Larisa Nikitina, Yanyan Wang · SAGE Open (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS