A novel method for evaluating earthquake forecast model performance and its implications for refining seismic likelihood model

SUMMARY Utilizing statistical tests to evaluate earthquake forecasting models is crucial to improve forecasting strategies for seismic hazard assessment. We develop a novel evaluation method for alarm-based earthquake forecast, taking into account the magnitude of seismic energy and the impact area of earthquakes, instead of using solely seismic event number and epicentre locations in conventional approaches. First, we derive a scale law of Seismic Area by statistically analysing coseismal maps of past M ≥ 7.0 earthquakes. Second, we proportionally allocate Seismic Moment to surrounding cells based on corresponding seismic area within each cell (SASM-test). Compared to the Molchan test which is conventionally applied for models that forecast the epicentre location, our proposed SASM-test can be applied to the evaluation of forecasting models that focus on the whole earthquake rupture (source area). Third, we apply the SASM-test method to the time-independent probabilistic earthquake forecasting model for the southeastern Tibetan Plateau (RELM-TibetSE) and compare it with other evaluation methods. The retrospective testing shows that the SASM-test demonstrate relatively higher sensitivity, enabling to detect subtle differences between similar models that conventional methods may overlook. Additionally, retrospective test results indicate that: (i) Earthquake forecasting models using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data performed better in forecasting the ‘source area’ than the ‘epicentre location’; (ii) forecasting models based on principal strain rate outperformed the models based on maximum shear strain rate in forecasting both the epicentre location and the source area and (iii) incorporating spatially varying seismogenic layer thickness and rigidity into seismic forecasting models could improve their ability to forecast the ‘source area’ compared to using uniform seismogenic layer properties. The newly proposed SASM-test method can provide a more sensitive and comprehensive approach for the evaluation of earthquake forecasting models, contributing to the refinement of seismic hazard assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Journal International
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae405
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel method for evaluating earthquake forecast model performance and its implications for refining seismic likelihood model

Xue-Liang Chen, Guojie Meng, Weiwei Wu, Yan-Cong Yang et al.
2 citations
Geophysical Journal International
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
0.69
article

A novel method for evaluating earthquake forecast model performance and its implications for refining seismic likelihood model

Xue-Liang Chen, Guojie Meng, Weiwei Wu, Yan-Cong Yang, Z Dong, Congmin Wei, Yitong Wang, Guoqiang Zhao
article en
2 citations

Abstract

SUMMARY Utilizing statistical tests to evaluate earthquake forecasting models is crucial to improve forecasting strategies for seismic hazard assessment. We develop a novel evaluation method for alarm-based earthquake forecast, taking into account the magnitude of seismic energy and the impact area of earthquakes, instead of using solely seismic event number and epicentre locations in conventional approaches. First, we derive a scale law of Seismic Area by statistically analysing coseismal maps of past M ≥ 7.0 earthquakes. Second, we proportionally allocate Seismic Moment to surrounding cells based on corresponding seismic area within each cell (SASM-test). Compared to the Molchan test which is conventionally applied for models that forecast the epicentre location, our proposed SASM-test can be applied to the evaluation of forecasting models that focus on the whole earthquake rupture (source area). Third, we apply the SASM-test method to the time-independent probabilistic earthquake forecasting model for the southeastern Tibetan Plateau (RELM-TibetSE) and compare it with other evaluation methods. The retrospective testing shows that the SASM-test demonstrate relatively higher sensitivity, enabling to detect subtle differences between similar models that conventional methods may overlook. Additionally, retrospective test results indicate that: (i) Earthquake forecasting models using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data performed better in forecasting the ‘source area’ than the ‘epicentre location’; (ii) forecasting models based on principal strain rate outperformed the models based on maximum shear strain rate in forecasting both the epicentre location and the source area and (iii) incorporating spatially varying seismogenic layer thickness and rigidity into seismic forecasting models could improve their ability to forecast the ‘source area’ compared to using uniform seismogenic layer properties. The newly proposed SASM-test method can provide a more sensitive and comprehensive approach for the evaluation of earthquake forecasting models, contributing to the refinement of seismic hazard assessments.

Geophysical Journal InternationalVol. 240(1)
China Earthquake Administration (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.