Could recent advances and new perspectives in science education and conceptual change improve public understanding of science?

This perspective article explores the intersection of science education advancements and public science understanding improvement efforts, critiquing the still prevalent “deficit model” of science communication. It argues for a nuanced approach, incorporating insights from conceptual change research and the coexistence of scientific and misconceived notions within learners. Highlighting the prospects and promises of representational pluralism, it suggests strategies for science communicators to foster public engagement, emphasizing the importance of young audiences, avoiding simplistic dichotomies, and promoting critical thinking. The piece advocates for mutual enrichment between science education and communication, aiming for a well-informed, epistemologically competent public capable of navigating the complexities of scientific discourse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Communication
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1404875
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Could recent advances and new perspectives in science education and conceptual change improve public understanding of science?

Patrice Potvin, Michel Bélanger
Frontiers in Communication
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Could recent advances and new perspectives in science education and conceptual change improve public understanding of science?

Patrice Potvin, Michel Bélanger
article en

Abstract

This perspective article explores the intersection of science education advancements and public science understanding improvement efforts, critiquing the still prevalent “deficit model” of science communication. It argues for a nuanced approach, incorporating insights from conceptual change research and the coexistence of scientific and misconceived notions within learners. Highlighting the prospects and promises of representational pluralism, it suggests strategies for science communicators to foster public engagement, emphasizing the importance of young audiences, avoiding simplistic dichotomies, and promoting critical thinking. The piece advocates for mutual enrichment between science education and communication, aiming for a well-informed, epistemologically competent public capable of navigating the complexities of scientific discourse.

Frontiers in CommunicationVol. 9
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA), Université du Québec à Rimouski (CA), École de Technologie Supérieure (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Could recent advances and new perspectives in science education and conceptual change improve public understanding of science? — Patrice Potvin, Michel Bélanger · Frontiers in Communication (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS