Extending Tactile Space With Handheld Tools: A Re-Analysis and Review

Tools can extend the sense of touch beyond the body, allowing the user to extract sensory information about distal objects in their environment. Though research on this topic has trickled in over the last few decades, little is known about the neurocomputational mechanisms of extended touch. In 2016, along with our late collaborator Vincent Hayward, we began a series of studies that attempted to fill this gap. We specifically focused on the ability to localize touch on the surface of a rod, as if it were part of the body. We have conducted eight behavioral experiments over the last several years, all of which have found that humans are incredibly accurate at tool-extended tactile localization. In the present article, we perform a model-driven re-analysis of these findings with an eye toward estimating the underlying parameters that map sensory input into spatial perception. This re-analysis revealed that users can almost perfectly localize touch on handheld tools. This raises the question of how humans can be so good at localizing touch on an inert noncorporeal object. The remainder of the paper focuses on three aspects of this process that occupied much of our collaboration with Vincent: the mechanical information used by participants for localization; the speed by which the nervous system can transform this information into a spatial percept; and whether body-based computations are repurposed for tool-extended touch. In all, these studies underscore the special relationship between bodies and tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Multisensory Research
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-bja10134
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extending Tactile Space With Handheld Tools: A Re-Analysis and Review

Alessandro Farnè, Luke E. Miller
3 citations
Multisensory Research
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
1.03
article

Extending Tactile Space With Handheld Tools: A Re-Analysis and Review

Alessandro Farnè, Luke E. Miller
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Tools can extend the sense of touch beyond the body, allowing the user to extract sensory information about distal objects in their environment. Though research on this topic has trickled in over the last few decades, little is known about the neurocomputational mechanisms of extended touch. In 2016, along with our late collaborator Vincent Hayward, we began a series of studies that attempted to fill this gap. We specifically focused on the ability to localize touch on the surface of a rod, as if it were part of the body. We have conducted eight behavioral experiments over the last several years, all of which have found that humans are incredibly accurate at tool-extended tactile localization. In the present article, we perform a model-driven re-analysis of these findings with an eye toward estimating the underlying parameters that map sensory input into spatial perception. This re-analysis revealed that users can almost perfectly localize touch on handheld tools. This raises the question of how humans can be so good at localizing touch on an inert noncorporeal object. The remainder of the paper focuses on three aspects of this process that occupied much of our collaboration with Vincent: the mechanical information used by participants for localization; the speed by which the nervous system can transform this information into a spatial percept; and whether body-based computations are repurposed for tool-extended touch. In all, these studies underscore the special relationship between bodies and tools.

Multisensory Research
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Inserm (FR), Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (FR)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.