Distinct Enough for the Category of Korean Adjectives

The paper seeks to reinforce the standard view of an independent category for Korean adjectives. Korean adjectives share many properties with verbs, including the use of the same conjugation for tense and honorific, and the requirement to occur in a relative clause to modify a noun. These similarities have led some to treat adjectives as stative verbs or unaccusative verbs. The paper challenges the treatment of Korean adjectives as stative verbs, by exemplifying the contrasts of the compatibility with the present tense morpheme –nun/n, distinctive relativizers –nun and -(u)n, the ability to function as the complement of ~ko sipta ‘want to’, and the ability to assign the accusative case to the second argument. Furthermore, the paper refutes the treatment of Korean adjectives as unaccusative verbs, and illustrates the contrasts between Korean unaccusative verbs and adjectives. Unaccusative verbs cannot combine with –eci despite transitive verbs can. On the other hand, Korean adjectives can be combined with –eci and form A–eci construction to create inchoatives.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Linguistics
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17002/sil..73.202410.153
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinct Enough for the Category of Korean Adjectives

A. A. Kim
Studies in Linguistics
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Distinct Enough for the Category of Korean Adjectives

A. A. Kim
article en

Abstract

The paper seeks to reinforce the standard view of an independent category for Korean adjectives. Korean adjectives share many properties with verbs, including the use of the same conjugation for tense and honorific, and the requirement to occur in a relative clause to modify a noun. These similarities have led some to treat adjectives as stative verbs or unaccusative verbs. The paper challenges the treatment of Korean adjectives as stative verbs, by exemplifying the contrasts of the compatibility with the present tense morpheme –nun/n, distinctive relativizers –nun and -(u)n, the ability to function as the complement of ~ko sipta ‘want to’, and the ability to assign the accusative case to the second argument. Furthermore, the paper refutes the treatment of Korean adjectives as unaccusative verbs, and illustrates the contrasts between Korean unaccusative verbs and adjectives. Unaccusative verbs cannot combine with –eci despite transitive verbs can. On the other hand, Korean adjectives can be combined with –eci and form A–eci construction to create inchoatives.

Studies in LinguisticsVol. 73
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Distinct Enough for the Category of Korean Adjectives — A. A. Kim · Studies in Linguistics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS