Why Association?

Abstract Although the text of the United States Constitution does not protect a constitutional right of association, it was understood to do so (via the Assembly Clause of the First Amendment) as far back as the 1790s. In 1958 the US Supreme Court confirmed that the First Amendment protected a right of association. However, the Court subsequently limited that right to expressive associations, because it treated the association right as subordinate to free speech. This doctrinal move was inconsistent with the history and purposes of the right. The right of association in the US is historically linked to democratic self-governance; but associations advance democracy in a myriad of ways including, but not limited to, enhancing the ability of citizens to participate in public discourse. Recognizing this fact should lead to protecting an expansive right to associate. This understanding also supports two controversial aspects of the US associational right: the right to discriminate, and protection for subversive associations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-bja10085
Primary Topic
Law, Rights, and Freedoms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Association?

Ashutosh Bhagwat
European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance
Law, Rights, and Freedoms
article

Why Association?

Ashutosh Bhagwat
article en

Abstract

Abstract Although the text of the United States Constitution does not protect a constitutional right of association, it was understood to do so (via the Assembly Clause of the First Amendment) as far back as the 1790s. In 1958 the US Supreme Court confirmed that the First Amendment protected a right of association. However, the Court subsequently limited that right to expressive associations, because it treated the association right as subordinate to free speech. This doctrinal move was inconsistent with the history and purposes of the right. The right of association in the US is historically linked to democratic self-governance; but associations advance democracy in a myriad of ways including, but not limited to, enhancing the ability of citizens to participate in public discourse. Recognizing this fact should lead to protecting an expansive right to associate. This understanding also supports two controversial aspects of the US associational right: the right to discriminate, and protection for subversive associations.

European Journal of Comparative Law and GovernanceVol. 12(1-2)
University of California System (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Law, Rights, and Freedoms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why Association? — Ashutosh Bhagwat · European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS