Chapter 1: On the Dismissal of the MSPI Action by the General Court of the EU (Case T-158/21)

Abstract In its judgment of 9 November 2022, the General Court (GC) of the European Union fully upheld the European Commission’s Communication setting out the reasons for not adopting any of the (legislative) proposals put forward by the Minority SafePack Initiative (MSPI). This paper argues that several MSPI proposals do indeed tie in with existing EU competences and would lead to a significant extension of the protection of persons belonging to minorities within the Union. However, given the Commission’s wide discretion in responding to European Citizens’ Initiatives (ECI) and the limited standard of judicial review in this regard, it will be difficult to challenge the Commission’s dismissive response even on appeal. This does not necessarily mean the end of the initiative. The validity of its proposals under EU law is visibly consolidating and even the outcome of the appeal proceedings would not prejudice seeking to implement them by other (political) means. This paper provides a legal assessment of the above-mentioned first instance decision.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Yearbook of Minority Issues Online
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/22116117_02101002
Primary Topic
EU Law and Policy Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chapter 1: On the Dismissal of the MSPI Action by the General Court of the EU (Case T-158/21)

Moritz Malkmus
European Yearbook of Minority Issues Online
EU Law and Policy Analysis
article

Chapter 1: On the Dismissal of the MSPI Action by the General Court of the EU (Case T-158/21)

Moritz Malkmus
article en

Abstract

Abstract In its judgment of 9 November 2022, the General Court (GC) of the European Union fully upheld the European Commission’s Communication setting out the reasons for not adopting any of the (legislative) proposals put forward by the Minority SafePack Initiative (MSPI). This paper argues that several MSPI proposals do indeed tie in with existing EU competences and would lead to a significant extension of the protection of persons belonging to minorities within the Union. However, given the Commission’s wide discretion in responding to European Citizens’ Initiatives (ECI) and the limited standard of judicial review in this regard, it will be difficult to challenge the Commission’s dismissive response even on appeal. This does not necessarily mean the end of the initiative. The validity of its proposals under EU law is visibly consolidating and even the outcome of the appeal proceedings would not prejudice seeking to implement them by other (political) means. This paper provides a legal assessment of the above-mentioned first instance decision.

European Yearbook of Minority Issues OnlineVol. 21(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
EU Law and Policy Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Chapter 1: On the Dismissal of the MSPI Action by the General Court of the EU (Case T-158/21) — Moritz Malkmus · European Yearbook of Minority Issues Online (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS