Chapter 2: Twenty-Five Years of Minority Rights Monitoring in Ukraine

Abstract The war in Ukraine is the most high-profile war in Europe since the adoption and subsequent consolidation of European minority rights standards developed in the 1990s. Using a chronological approach, this contribution uses the case study of Ukraine to illustrate significant ongoing challenges to the realisation of minority rights and to the monitoring work under the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, as well as ongoing contestation and debate over its interpretation and application in specific contexts. It thereby clearly demonstrates the problems of seeing minority rights protection as a linear process of progression and socialisation rather than an ongoing process of negotiation that constantly needs to be adapted to current political realities. This is crucial to discussions not just over the future of minority rights in Ukraine but also to the future work of the Framework Convention Advisory Committee.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Yearbook of Minority Issues Online
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/22116117_02101003
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chapter 2: Twenty-Five Years of Minority Rights Monitoring in Ukraine

Elizabeth Craig
European Yearbook of Minority Issues Online
European and International Law Studies
article

Chapter 2: Twenty-Five Years of Minority Rights Monitoring in Ukraine

Elizabeth Craig
article en

Abstract

Abstract The war in Ukraine is the most high-profile war in Europe since the adoption and subsequent consolidation of European minority rights standards developed in the 1990s. Using a chronological approach, this contribution uses the case study of Ukraine to illustrate significant ongoing challenges to the realisation of minority rights and to the monitoring work under the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, as well as ongoing contestation and debate over its interpretation and application in specific contexts. It thereby clearly demonstrates the problems of seeing minority rights protection as a linear process of progression and socialisation rather than an ongoing process of negotiation that constantly needs to be adapted to current political realities. This is crucial to discussions not just over the future of minority rights in Ukraine but also to the future work of the Framework Convention Advisory Committee.

European Yearbook of Minority Issues OnlineVol. 21(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.