Chapter 4: Politics of the Memory of Deportation and Interethnic Relations in Post-2014 Crimea

Abstract This article analyses the Crimean Tatars’ politics of the memory of deportation in post-Soviet Crimea, and focuses on the changes in these politics since Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014. This article is organized as follows. First, I outline the main memory-related practices associated with deportation, following the mass repatriation of Crimean Tatars in the early 1990s. Second, I describe the changes that have occurred in the politics of the memory of deportation since the 2014 annexation of Crimea. Third, I use interviews and social media analysis to show how these changes were perceived by the Crimean Tatars. Finally, based on expert interviews, I discuss how these changes affected interethnic relations in Crimea. I argue that Russia’s policy regarding the Crimean Tatars’ memory of the deportation in annexed Crimea is intended to depoliticize and regulate it according to official narratives about the Soviet past, and has the potential to exacerbate interethnic relations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Yearbook of Minority Issues Online
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/22116117_02101005
Primary Topic
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chapter 4: Politics of the Memory of Deportation and Interethnic Relations in Post-2014 Crimea

Elmira Muratova
1 links
European Yearbook of Minority Issues Online
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
article

Chapter 4: Politics of the Memory of Deportation and Interethnic Relations in Post-2014 Crimea

Elmira Muratova
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article analyses the Crimean Tatars’ politics of the memory of deportation in post-Soviet Crimea, and focuses on the changes in these politics since Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014. This article is organized as follows. First, I outline the main memory-related practices associated with deportation, following the mass repatriation of Crimean Tatars in the early 1990s. Second, I describe the changes that have occurred in the politics of the memory of deportation since the 2014 annexation of Crimea. Third, I use interviews and social media analysis to show how these changes were perceived by the Crimean Tatars. Finally, based on expert interviews, I discuss how these changes affected interethnic relations in Crimea. I argue that Russia’s policy regarding the Crimean Tatars’ memory of the deportation in annexed Crimea is intended to depoliticize and regulate it according to official narratives about the Soviet past, and has the potential to exacerbate interethnic relations.

European Yearbook of Minority Issues OnlineVol. 21(1)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.