Are threatened species important for glueing interaction networks together?

• Ecological interactions shape the functioning and stability of ecosystems. • We assessed the vulnerability of species and their interactions in a mammal network. • The most important interactions in the network are, at least, partially at risk. • Threatened and non-threatened species make unique contributions to the ecological network. Biotic interactions are a critical element for the functioning and the stability of ecosystems, yet anthropogenic pressures can significantly disrupt these networks of interacting species. While species-focused conservation is central to most conservation policy, it is also vital to identify the interactions at risk and the ones that play a disproportionate role in glueing communities together. Here we assess the importance of species for ecological network integrity and the risk of loss of interactions that is brought by species loss in a global predator-prey network comprising 877 mammal species. We calculated the importance of species and their interactions using network centrality analyses. The risk of loss of interactions was determined by quantifying the extinction risk of each pair of interacting species. Additionally, we examined whether specific traits or phylogenetic history influenced both extinction risk and species importance. We found that extinction risk is unrelated to species’ importance in the network. We also showed that the most important interactions are at least partially at risk of being lost. Moreover, important and threatened species showed higher ecological distinctiveness, but similar low evolutionary distinctiveness. We emphasise that conservation strategies should consider the contributions of both threatened and non-threatened species to ecological networks, acknowledging the vital roles they play for ecosystem stability and function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2024.11.003
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are threatened species important for glueing interaction networks together?

Frederico Mestre, Juan David González‐Trujillo, Vinícius A. G. Bastazini, Miguel B. Araújo et al.
3 citations
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
3.40
article

Are threatened species important for glueing interaction networks together?

Frederico Mestre, Juan David González‐Trujillo, Vinícius A. G. Bastazini, Miguel B. Araújo, Pamela González‐del‐Pliego, Núria Galiana
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Ecological interactions shape the functioning and stability of ecosystems. • We assessed the vulnerability of species and their interactions in a mammal network. • The most important interactions in the network are, at least, partially at risk. • Threatened and non-threatened species make unique contributions to the ecological network. Biotic interactions are a critical element for the functioning and the stability of ecosystems, yet anthropogenic pressures can significantly disrupt these networks of interacting species. While species-focused conservation is central to most conservation policy, it is also vital to identify the interactions at risk and the ones that play a disproportionate role in glueing communities together. Here we assess the importance of species for ecological network integrity and the risk of loss of interactions that is brought by species loss in a global predator-prey network comprising 877 mammal species. We calculated the importance of species and their interactions using network centrality analyses. The risk of loss of interactions was determined by quantifying the extinction risk of each pair of interacting species. Additionally, we examined whether specific traits or phylogenetic history influenced both extinction risk and species importance. We found that extinction risk is unrelated to species’ importance in the network. We also showed that the most important interactions are at least partially at risk of being lost. Moreover, important and threatened species showed higher ecological distinctiveness, but similar low evolutionary distinctiveness. We emphasise that conservation strategies should consider the contributions of both threatened and non-threatened species to ecological networks, acknowledging the vital roles they play for ecosystem stability and function.

Perspectives in Ecology and ConservationVol. 22(4)
Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (JP), Universidad Nacional de Colombia (CO), Sustainability Institute (ZA), Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (ES), University of Algarve (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.