Problems of enforcement of court decisions during martial law

The article examines the introduction of martial law in Ukraine, which significantly changed the situation, in particular, in the system of forced execution of court orders, decisions, resolutions, etc. It has been analyzed that enforcement of executive letters, orders, court decisions and resolutions, notary inscriptions is carried out by bodies of the State Executive Service of Ukraine and private executors. It is noted that during the period of martial law, two main legislative acts were adopted, which changed the procedure for introducing executive proceedings. For example, the Law of Ukraine «On Amendments to Chapter XIII «Final and Transitional Provisions» of the Law of Ukraine «On Enforcement Proceedings» dated March 15, 2022 No. 2129-IX and the Law of Ukraine «On Amendments to Certain Laws of Ukraine Regarding Enforcement Activities court decisions, decisions of other bodies and officials during the period of martial law» dated 04/11/2023. It was found that the system of enforcement of court decisions of state bodies, legal entities, and individuals is important for ensuring the implementation of state functions related to the restoration and protection of violated rights. Also, the fact that there are many problematic situations that need to be resolved, for example: technical problems and shortcomings of the system or registers, a more favorable position of debtors than collectors, narrowing of the actions of public and private executors and their remuneration. The enforcement institution underwent changes, but they were temporary and helped to keep our country afloat during martial law. During the period of martial law, court decisions, orders, decrees, orders and resolutions must be implemented and their implementation must be ensured by public and private executors. For the high-quality and effective exercise of their powers, persons and bodies that carry out the enforcement of decisions have administrative powers, in turn, they provide for the possibility of subordinating certain subjects and comply with mandatory prescriptions or orders.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2024.85.2.58
Citations
1
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Problems of enforcement of court decisions during martial law

Н. А. Лугіна, Ya. I. Pokorska
1 citations
Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law
European and International Law Studies
2.23
article

Problems of enforcement of court decisions during martial law

Н. А. Лугіна, Ya. I. Pokorska
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article examines the introduction of martial law in Ukraine, which significantly changed the situation, in particular, in the system of forced execution of court orders, decisions, resolutions, etc. It has been analyzed that enforcement of executive letters, orders, court decisions and resolutions, notary inscriptions is carried out by bodies of the State Executive Service of Ukraine and private executors. It is noted that during the period of martial law, two main legislative acts were adopted, which changed the procedure for introducing executive proceedings. For example, the Law of Ukraine «On Amendments to Chapter XIII «Final and Transitional Provisions» of the Law of Ukraine «On Enforcement Proceedings» dated March 15, 2022 No. 2129-IX and the Law of Ukraine «On Amendments to Certain Laws of Ukraine Regarding Enforcement Activities court decisions, decisions of other bodies and officials during the period of martial law» dated 04/11/2023. It was found that the system of enforcement of court decisions of state bodies, legal entities, and individuals is important for ensuring the implementation of state functions related to the restoration and protection of violated rights. Also, the fact that there are many problematic situations that need to be resolved, for example: technical problems and shortcomings of the system or registers, a more favorable position of debtors than collectors, narrowing of the actions of public and private executors and their remuneration. The enforcement institution underwent changes, but they were temporary and helped to keep our country afloat during martial law. During the period of martial law, court decisions, orders, decrees, orders and resolutions must be implemented and their implementation must be ensured by public and private executors. For the high-quality and effective exercise of their powers, persons and bodies that carry out the enforcement of decisions have administrative powers, in turn, they provide for the possibility of subordinating certain subjects and comply with mandatory prescriptions or orders.

Uzhhorod National University Herald Series LawVol. 2(85)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
European and International Law Studies
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Problems of enforcement of court decisions during martial law — Н. А. Лугіна, Ya. I. Pokorska · Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS