AI-empowered KM processes for decision-making: empirical evidence from worldwide organisations

Purpose This paper aims to provide empirical evidence on adopting artificial intelligence (AI), including generative AI, in knowledge management (KM) processes and its impact on organisational decision-making. Specifically, the study addresses three key research questions: RQ1: How is (generative) AI adopted within KM processes in organisations? RQ2: What factors influence the adoption of AI in these processes, either facilitating or inhibiting it? RQ3: How does AI adoption in KM processes affect organisational decision-making? Design/methodology/approach An explorative investigation has been conducted through semi-structured interviews with KM and AI experts from a worldwide sample of 52 mostly private, large and for-profit organisations. Interviews have been analysed through a mixed thematic analysis. Findings The study provides an original framework in which the three investigated concepts are interconnected according to a dual relationship: linear and retroactive and 20 factors affecting AI adoption within KM processes. Practical implications The provided model guides managers in improving their organisational decision-making through AI adoption in KM processes. Moreover, according to the rational decision-making model, the authors propose a six-step systematic procedure for managers. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that simultaneously addresses AI, KM and decision-making and provides an integrated framework showing the relationships between them, allowing organisations to better and practically understand how to ameliorate their decision-making through AI adoption in KM processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Knowledge Management
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-03-2024-0262
Citations
43
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
22.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-empowered KM processes for decision-making: empirical evidence from worldwide organisations

Ginetta Gueli, Mateus Panizzon, Shivam Gupta, Marco Ardolino et al.
43 citations
Journal of Knowledge Management
Big Data and Business Intelligence
22.73
article

AI-empowered KM processes for decision-making: empirical evidence from worldwide organisations

Ginetta Gueli, Mateus Panizzon, Shivam Gupta, Marco Ardolino, Luna Leoni
article en
43 citations

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to provide empirical evidence on adopting artificial intelligence (AI), including generative AI, in knowledge management (KM) processes and its impact on organisational decision-making. Specifically, the study addresses three key research questions: RQ1: How is (generative) AI adopted within KM processes in organisations? RQ2: What factors influence the adoption of AI in these processes, either facilitating or inhibiting it? RQ3: How does AI adoption in KM processes affect organisational decision-making? Design/methodology/approach An explorative investigation has been conducted through semi-structured interviews with KM and AI experts from a worldwide sample of 52 mostly private, large and for-profit organisations. Interviews have been analysed through a mixed thematic analysis. Findings The study provides an original framework in which the three investigated concepts are interconnected according to a dual relationship: linear and retroactive and 20 factors affecting AI adoption within KM processes. Practical implications The provided model guides managers in improving their organisational decision-making through AI adoption in KM processes. Moreover, according to the rational decision-making model, the authors propose a six-step systematic procedure for managers. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that simultaneously addresses AI, KM and decision-making and provides an integrated framework showing the relationships between them, allowing organisations to better and practically understand how to ameliorate their decision-making through AI adoption in KM processes.

Journal of Knowledge ManagementVol. 28(11)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Center for Strategic and International Studies (US), NEOMA Business School (FR), Universidade de Caxias do Sul (BR), Brescia University (US), University of Brescia (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
22.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.