Placental T2* as a measure of placental function across field strength from 0.55T to 3T

Placental MRI is increasingly implemented in clinical obstetrics and research. Functional imaging, especially T2*, has been shown to vary across gestation and in pathology. Translation into the clinical arena has been slow because of time taken to mask the region of interest and owing to differences in T2* results depending on field strength. This paper contributes methodology to remove these barriers by utilising data from 0.55, 1.5 and 3T MRI to provide a fully automated segmentation tool; determining field strength dependency of placental assessment techniques; and deriving normal ranges for T2* by gestational age but independent of field strength. T2* datasets were acquired across field strengths. Automatic quantification including fully automatic masking was achieved and tested in 270 datasets across fields. Normal curves for quantitative placental mean T2*, volume and other derived measurements were obtained in 273 fetal MRI scans and z-scores calculated. The fully automatic segmentation achieved excellent quantification results (Dice scores of 0.807 at 3T, 0.796 at 1.5T and 0.815 at 0.55T.). Similar changes were seen between placental T2* and gestational age across all three field strengths (p < 0.05). Z-scores were generated. This study provides confidence in the translatability of T2* trends across field strengths in fetal imaging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77406-6
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Placental T2* as a measure of placental function across field strength from 0.55T to 3T

Serena J. Counsell, Megan Hall, Daniel Cromb, Jana Hutter et al.
5 citations
Scientific Reports
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
5.55
article

Placental T2* as a measure of placental function across field strength from 0.55T to 3T

Serena J. Counsell, Megan Hall, Daniel Cromb, Jana Hutter, Jordina Aviles Verdera, Mary Rutherford, Joseph V. Hajnal, Lisa Story, Sara Neves Silva
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Placental MRI is increasingly implemented in clinical obstetrics and research. Functional imaging, especially T2*, has been shown to vary across gestation and in pathology. Translation into the clinical arena has been slow because of time taken to mask the region of interest and owing to differences in T2* results depending on field strength. This paper contributes methodology to remove these barriers by utilising data from 0.55, 1.5 and 3T MRI to provide a fully automated segmentation tool; determining field strength dependency of placental assessment techniques; and deriving normal ranges for T2* by gestational age but independent of field strength. T2* datasets were acquired across field strengths. Automatic quantification including fully automatic masking was achieved and tested in 270 datasets across fields. Normal curves for quantitative placental mean T2*, volume and other derived measurements were obtained in 273 fetal MRI scans and z-scores calculated. The fully automatic segmentation achieved excellent quantification results (Dice scores of 0.807 at 3T, 0.796 at 1.5T and 0.815 at 0.55T.). Similar changes were seen between placental T2* and gestational age across all three field strengths (p < 0.05). Z-scores were generated. This study provides confidence in the translatability of T2* trends across field strengths in fetal imaging.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
St Thomas' Hospital (GB), King's College London (GB), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE)
Wellcome Trust, UK Research and Innovation, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Centre For Medical Engineering, King’s College London
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
5.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.