Responding to nonemergency calls for service via video: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract Research summary We tested the effectiveness of virtual response in policing as an alternative to the traditional physical presence of officers to nonemergency calls for service. We randomly assigned 1059 eligible calls to either virtual or in‐person responses. We estimated the results in terms of waiting time, criminal justice outcomes, cost efficiency, and victim satisfaction based on a representative sample of telephone interviews. We found significant improvements across all measures when using a virtual response, including reduced victim waiting times, greater odds of arrest and charges, and enhanced perceptions of procedural justice, satisfaction, trust, and confidence in the police service. We found no adverse effects on victims due to the lack of physical presence. Research implications These findings suggest that, as with e‐health services, law enforcement can benefit from a cost–beneficial virtual response to nonemergency calls for service. We encourage its consideration as a mass deployment option in policing, as well as a basis for future experimental replications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminology & Public Policy
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12690
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Policing Practices and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responding to nonemergency calls for service via video: A randomized controlled trial

S. E. E. Gates, Barak Ariel, Noy Assaraf
1 citations
Criminology & Public Policy
Policing Practices and Perceptions
2.23
article

Responding to nonemergency calls for service via video: A randomized controlled trial

S. E. E. Gates, Barak Ariel, Noy Assaraf
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Research summary We tested the effectiveness of virtual response in policing as an alternative to the traditional physical presence of officers to nonemergency calls for service. We randomly assigned 1059 eligible calls to either virtual or in‐person responses. We estimated the results in terms of waiting time, criminal justice outcomes, cost efficiency, and victim satisfaction based on a representative sample of telephone interviews. We found significant improvements across all measures when using a virtual response, including reduced victim waiting times, greater odds of arrest and charges, and enhanced perceptions of procedural justice, satisfaction, trust, and confidence in the police service. We found no adverse effects on victims due to the lack of physical presence. Research implications These findings suggest that, as with e‐health services, law enforcement can benefit from a cost–beneficial virtual response to nonemergency calls for service. We encourage its consideration as a mass deployment option in policing, as well as a basis for future experimental replications.

Criminology & Public PolicyVol. 24(3)
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), University of Cambridge (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Policing Practices and Perceptions
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Responding to nonemergency calls for service via video: A randomized controlled trial — S. E. E. Gates, Barak Ariel, et al. · Criminology & Public Policy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS