Surviving precarious work: differing forms, tactics and strategies

Purpose This article explores differentiation in the responses of precarious workers to the instability and uncertainty imposed on their work by employing organizations. Our focus is on the ways in which different workers respond to precarious working conditions, with a particular interest on marginalised groups who have been especially overlooked by studies of workforce precarity. Design/methodology/approach Employs an approach akin to grounded theory in an exploratory research design and utilizes in-depth, semi-structured interviews of 56 precarious workers. Findings Finds that different precarious workers, with divergent characteristics and resources, facing differing working conditions, and diverse structural constraints vary in the ways in which their strategies of surviving precarious work are manifested. Uncovers three differing forms of precarious workers who each employ a different range of tactics and strategies in work. Originality/value Generates insights into differentiation of precarious workers in their responses to the ambiguous, challenging and, in many ways, subjugating conditions of their working conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Employee Relations
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/er-04-2024-0200
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surviving precarious work: differing forms, tactics and strategies

Emmanuel Ogbonna, Lloyd C. Harris
1 citations
Employee Relations
Employment and Welfare Studies
0.85
article

Surviving precarious work: differing forms, tactics and strategies

Emmanuel Ogbonna, Lloyd C. Harris
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This article explores differentiation in the responses of precarious workers to the instability and uncertainty imposed on their work by employing organizations. Our focus is on the ways in which different workers respond to precarious working conditions, with a particular interest on marginalised groups who have been especially overlooked by studies of workforce precarity. Design/methodology/approach Employs an approach akin to grounded theory in an exploratory research design and utilizes in-depth, semi-structured interviews of 56 precarious workers. Findings Finds that different precarious workers, with divergent characteristics and resources, facing differing working conditions, and diverse structural constraints vary in the ways in which their strategies of surviving precarious work are manifested. Uncovers three differing forms of precarious workers who each employ a different range of tactics and strategies in work. Originality/value Generates insights into differentiation of precarious workers in their responses to the ambiguous, challenging and, in many ways, subjugating conditions of their working conditions.

Employee RelationsVol. 47(1)
University of Manchester (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Employment and Welfare Studies
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Surviving precarious work: differing forms, tactics and strategies — Emmanuel Ogbonna, Lloyd C. Harris · Employee Relations (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS