Stress distribution of customized abutment material and angles in dental implant systems: A finite element study

Aim: This study aims to use finite element analysis to evaluate stress distribution in implant components, restoration materials, and biological tissues for implants placed at different angles using various customized abutment materials. Methodology: 3D models of a three-member implant-supported fixed prosthesis were created using SolidWorks, with implants placed at positions 44 (4I) and 46 (6I). These models were imported into EXOCAD to design prosthetic restorations on custom abutments at three angles: straight (KD0), 10° (KD10), and 20° (KD20). Abutments were made from alumina (AL), titanium (TI), and zirconia (ZI). A 150 N load was applied to the occlusal table at a 30° angle in the buccolingual direction. Stress distribution was measured as von Mises Stress (vMS) values. Results: For implants, the lowest vMS value was observed in the KD0-AL group (4I: 9.984 MPa, 6I: 22.91 MPa), while the highest vMS value was found in the KD20-TI group (4I: 25.30 MPa, 6I: 42.03 MPa). Custom abutment and custom abutment screws (in general) showed higher vMS values in the AL material and lower vMS values in the TI material. In contrast, for cortical bone and restoration material, higher vMS values were observed in the TI material and lower vMS values in the AL material. Conclusion: Dental implants require effective stress distribution from occlusal loads to ensure long-term success. Excessive stress on the abutment and abutment screw can compromise the prosthetic outcome. Therefore, titanium (TI) abutments are preferred in the posterior region for their durability despite being less aesthetically pleasing. Additionally, a higher implant angle reduces strength, negatively impacting the implant's performance. How to cite this article: Mohammad R, Demirel MG, Erdoğdu M. Stress distribution of customized abutment material and angles in dental implant systems: A finite element study. Int Dent Res 2024;14(S1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.5577/indentres.567

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Dental Research
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.567
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stress distribution of customized abutment material and angles in dental implant systems: A finite element study

Mehmet Gökberkkaan Demirel, Meryem Erdoğdu, Reza Mohammadi
International Dental Research
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Stress distribution of customized abutment material and angles in dental implant systems: A finite element study

Mehmet Gökberkkaan Demirel, Meryem Erdoğdu, Reza Mohammadi
article en

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to use finite element analysis to evaluate stress distribution in implant components, restoration materials, and biological tissues for implants placed at different angles using various customized abutment materials. Methodology: 3D models of a three-member implant-supported fixed prosthesis were created using SolidWorks, with implants placed at positions 44 (4I) and 46 (6I). These models were imported into EXOCAD to design prosthetic restorations on custom abutments at three angles: straight (KD0), 10° (KD10), and 20° (KD20). Abutments were made from alumina (AL), titanium (TI), and zirconia (ZI). A 150 N load was applied to the occlusal table at a 30° angle in the buccolingual direction. Stress distribution was measured as von Mises Stress (vMS) values. Results: For implants, the lowest vMS value was observed in the KD0-AL group (4I: 9.984 MPa, 6I: 22.91 MPa), while the highest vMS value was found in the KD20-TI group (4I: 25.30 MPa, 6I: 42.03 MPa). Custom abutment and custom abutment screws (in general) showed higher vMS values in the AL material and lower vMS values in the TI material. In contrast, for cortical bone and restoration material, higher vMS values were observed in the TI material and lower vMS values in the AL material. Conclusion: Dental implants require effective stress distribution from occlusal loads to ensure long-term success. Excessive stress on the abutment and abutment screw can compromise the prosthetic outcome. Therefore, titanium (TI) abutments are preferred in the posterior region for their durability despite being less aesthetically pleasing. Additionally, a higher implant angle reduces strength, negatively impacting the implant's performance. How to cite this article: Mohammad R, Demirel MG, Erdoğdu M. Stress distribution of customized abutment material and angles in dental implant systems: A finite element study. Int Dent Res 2024;14(S1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.5577/indentres.567

International Dental ResearchVol. 14(Suppl. 1)
Necmettin Erbakan University (TR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.