News Sharing on Social Media: Mapping the Ideology of News Media, Politicians, and the Mass Public

Abstract This article examines the information sharing behavior of U.S. politicians and the mass public by mapping the ideological sharing space of political news on social media. As data, we use the near-universal currency of online information exchange: web links. We introduce a methodological approach and software to unify the measurement of ideology across social media platforms by using sharing data to jointly estimate the ideology of news media organizations, politicians, and the mass public. Empirically, we show that (1) politicians who share ideologically polarized content share, by far, the most political news and commentary and (2) that the less competitive elections are, the more likely politicians are to share polarized information. These results demonstrate that news and commentary shared by politicians come from a highly unrepresentative set of ideologically extreme legislators and that decreases in election pressures (e.g., by gerrymandering) may encourage polarized sharing behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Analysis
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2024.19
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

News Sharing on Social Media: Mapping the Ideology of News Media, Politicians, and the Mass Public

Gregory Eady, Jonathan Nagler, Richard Bonneau, Joshua A. Tucker
8 citations
Political Analysis
Social Media and Politics
7.66
article

News Sharing on Social Media: Mapping the Ideology of News Media, Politicians, and the Mass Public

Gregory Eady, Jonathan Nagler, Richard Bonneau, Joshua A. Tucker
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the information sharing behavior of U.S. politicians and the mass public by mapping the ideological sharing space of political news on social media. As data, we use the near-universal currency of online information exchange: web links. We introduce a methodological approach and software to unify the measurement of ideology across social media platforms by using sharing data to jointly estimate the ideology of news media organizations, politicians, and the mass public. Empirically, we show that (1) politicians who share ideologically polarized content share, by far, the most political news and commentary and (2) that the less competitive elections are, the more likely politicians are to share polarized information. These results demonstrate that news and commentary shared by politicians come from a highly unrepresentative set of ideologically extreme legislators and that decreases in election pressures (e.g., by gerrymandering) may encourage polarized sharing behavior.

Political AnalysisVol. 33(2)
University of Copenhagen (DK), New York University (US)
National Science Foundation, John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, Craig Newmark Philanthropies, Charles Koch Foundation, York University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Social Media and Politics
7.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.