Understanding the Effect of M(III) Choice in Heterodinuclear Polymerization Catalysts

The ring-opening copolymerization (ROCOP) of epoxides with CO<sub>2</sub> or anhydrides is a promising strategy to produce sustainable polycarbonates and polyesters. Currently, most catalysts are reliant on scarce and expensive cobalt as the active center, while more abundant aluminum and iron catalysts often suffer from lower activities. Here, two novel heterodinuclear catalysts, featuring abundant Al(III), Fe(III), and K(I) active centers, are synthesized, and their performance in the polymerization of four different monomer combinations is compared to that of their Co(III) analogue. The novel Al(III)K(I) catalyst exhibits outstanding activities in the cyclohexane oxide (CHO)/CO<sub>2</sub> ROCOP, and at 1 bar CO<sub>2</sub> pressure it is the fastest aluminum-based catalyst reported to date. The M(III) site electronics for all three catalysts, Al(III)K(I), Fe(III)K(I), and Co(III)K(I), are measured using IR and NMR spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, and single crystal X-ray diffraction. A correlation between M(III) electron density and catalytic activity is revealed and, based on the established structure-activity relationship, recommendations for the future catalyst design of abundant Al(III)- and Fe(III)-based catalysts are made. The catalytic performances of both Al(III)K(I) and Fe(III)K(I) are further contextualized against the relative elemental abundance and cost. On the balance of performance, abundance, and cost, the Al(III)K(I) complex is the better catalyst for the carbon dioxide/epoxide ROCOP, while Fe(III)K(I) is preferable for anhydride/epoxide ROCOP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Inorganic Chemistry
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c04430
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the Effect of M(III) Choice in Heterodinuclear Polymerization Catalysts

Charlotte K. Williams, Francesca Fiorentini, Katharina H. S. Eisenhardt
11 citations
Inorganic Chemistry
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
2.75
article

Understanding the Effect of M(III) Choice in Heterodinuclear Polymerization Catalysts

Charlotte K. Williams, Francesca Fiorentini, Katharina H. S. Eisenhardt
article en
11 citations

Abstract

The ring-opening copolymerization (ROCOP) of epoxides with CO<sub>2</sub> or anhydrides is a promising strategy to produce sustainable polycarbonates and polyesters. Currently, most catalysts are reliant on scarce and expensive cobalt as the active center, while more abundant aluminum and iron catalysts often suffer from lower activities. Here, two novel heterodinuclear catalysts, featuring abundant Al(III), Fe(III), and K(I) active centers, are synthesized, and their performance in the polymerization of four different monomer combinations is compared to that of their Co(III) analogue. The novel Al(III)K(I) catalyst exhibits outstanding activities in the cyclohexane oxide (CHO)/CO<sub>2</sub> ROCOP, and at 1 bar CO<sub>2</sub> pressure it is the fastest aluminum-based catalyst reported to date. The M(III) site electronics for all three catalysts, Al(III)K(I), Fe(III)K(I), and Co(III)K(I), are measured using IR and NMR spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, and single crystal X-ray diffraction. A correlation between M(III) electron density and catalytic activity is revealed and, based on the established structure-activity relationship, recommendations for the future catalyst design of abundant Al(III)- and Fe(III)-based catalysts are made. The catalytic performances of both Al(III)K(I) and Fe(III)K(I) are further contextualized against the relative elemental abundance and cost. On the balance of performance, abundance, and cost, the Al(III)K(I) complex is the better catalyst for the carbon dioxide/epoxide ROCOP, while Fe(III)K(I) is preferable for anhydride/epoxide ROCOP.

Inorganic ChemistryVol. 63(49)
Mansfield University (US), Oxford Research Group (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Innovate UK, Research England
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
2.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.