How valuable is an implementation toolkit for midwives? An exploratory study

It is crucial to progress health care practitioners understanding of how to accelerate the implementation and sustainment of new evidence-based practices in clinical settings, including strategies to support organisational readiness, local barriers or challenges, and partnerships between researchers and end-users. Evaluation of our midwifery-specific implementation Toolkit indicates health professionals require tailored materials and information specific to their disciplines and clinical work environments; ideally, packaged in a centalised, open-access format. Future research is required to evaluate the mid-to-longterm impact of our Toolkit on implementation initiatives in midwifery contexts, and to establish the adaptability of our Toolkit in other settings, and with other disciplines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Midwifery
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2024.104241
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How valuable is an implementation toolkit for midwives? An exploratory study

Sara Bayes, Linda P. Sweet, Peter Palamara, Dianne Bloxsome et al.
2 citations
Midwifery
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
1.70
article

How valuable is an implementation toolkit for midwives? An exploratory study

Sara Bayes, Linda P. Sweet, Peter Palamara, Dianne Bloxsome, Annemarie Annie De Leo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

It is crucial to progress health care practitioners understanding of how to accelerate the implementation and sustainment of new evidence-based practices in clinical settings, including strategies to support organisational readiness, local barriers or challenges, and partnerships between researchers and end-users. Evaluation of our midwifery-specific implementation Toolkit indicates health professionals require tailored materials and information specific to their disciplines and clinical work environments; ideally, packaged in a centalised, open-access format. Future research is required to evaluate the mid-to-longterm impact of our Toolkit on implementation initiatives in midwifery contexts, and to establish the adaptability of our Toolkit in other settings, and with other disciplines.

MidwiferyVol. 141
Edith Cowan University (AU), Deakin University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.