Comparing Public Procurement Transparency Mechanisms Between EU Member States

This article examined the transparency mechanisms in public procurement across European Union (EU) member states, focusing on their implementation, effectiveness, and challenges. Public procurement transparency, essential for reducing corruption and fostering fair competition, was found to vary significantly among member states due to differences in digital infrastructure, regulatory compliance, and local administrative capacities. Case studies from Germany, France, Poland, and Hungary illustrated these variations, with countries like Germany and Denmark demonstrating robust digital procurement systems that enabled open access to procurement data and improved accountability. In contrast, countries such as Poland and Hungary faced ongoing challenges with regional disparities and limited enforcement, impacting their ability to maintain transparency consistently. The analysis revealed that successful transparency mechanisms generally included accessible e-procurement platforms, public disclosure requirements, and strong regulatory oversight. Policy recommendations were suggested to promote harmonized transparency standards across the EU, emphasizing the need for technical support, capacity-building at regional levels, and a balanced approach to transparency and data protection. Overall, while transparency mechanisms have strengthened public procurement outcomes within the EU, disparities in their implementation highlighted the need for continued EU guidance and support to achieve uniform standards across member states. Keywords: Public procurement, Transparency, EU member states, Policy recommendations