Impact of dual caregiving on well-being and loneliness among ever-married women in Japan: A pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic comparison

• The prevalence of dual care managing childcare and elderly care increased from 2019 to 2021 in Japan. • The elderly care-only group experienced lower well-being than the no-care group in 2019 and 2021. • Dual care was associated with lower well-being and higher loneliness only in 2021, following the COVID-19 pandemic. • The study highlights the need for enhanced support for dual caregivers post-pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted people involved in a combination of childcare and elderly care (dual caregivers). As their number is expected to rise in some countries, there remains limited research on the impact of the pandemic on their well-being and loneliness. We utilized repeated cross-sectional data from a large internet survey conducted between 2019 and 2021 to examine the association between informal caregiving status (no care, childcare only, elderly care only, and dual care) and the deterioration of well-being and loneliness among married women aged 20–59. In 2019, the total sample size was 7,357 (60 dual care, 3,630 elderly care only, 3,470 childcare only, and 3,197 no care). In 2021, the sample comprised 6,645 (77 dual care, 3,164 elderly care only, 148 childcare only, and 3,256 no care). In 2019, the adjusted odds ratio (95 % confidence interval [CI]) for lower well-being and higher loneliness in informal caregiving statuses (childcare only, elderly care only, and dual care) compared to no care was 1.38 (1.03–1.86), significant only for elderly care only. In 2021, elderly care only remained significant, with an odds ratio of 1.84 (1.15–2.97), while dual care was associated with lower well-being (1.55 (1.11–2.20) and higher loneliness (2.08 (1.24–3.49). Our study found that dual caregivers experienced greater declines in well-being and increased loneliness following the pandemic than non-caregivers. This highlights the importance of enhancing support for dual caregivers during current and future crises to prevent worsening well-being and loneliness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aggp.2024.100101
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of dual caregiving on well-being and loneliness among ever-married women in Japan: A pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic comparison

Makiko Kawabe, Nanako Tamiya, Takehiro Sugiyama, Yoko Moriyama
2 citations
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
2.26
article

Impact of dual caregiving on well-being and loneliness among ever-married women in Japan: A pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic comparison

Makiko Kawabe, Nanako Tamiya, Takehiro Sugiyama, Yoko Moriyama
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• The prevalence of dual care managing childcare and elderly care increased from 2019 to 2021 in Japan. • The elderly care-only group experienced lower well-being than the no-care group in 2019 and 2021. • Dual care was associated with lower well-being and higher loneliness only in 2021, following the COVID-19 pandemic. • The study highlights the need for enhanced support for dual caregivers post-pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted people involved in a combination of childcare and elderly care (dual caregivers). As their number is expected to rise in some countries, there remains limited research on the impact of the pandemic on their well-being and loneliness. We utilized repeated cross-sectional data from a large internet survey conducted between 2019 and 2021 to examine the association between informal caregiving status (no care, childcare only, elderly care only, and dual care) and the deterioration of well-being and loneliness among married women aged 20–59. In 2019, the total sample size was 7,357 (60 dual care, 3,630 elderly care only, 3,470 childcare only, and 3,197 no care). In 2021, the sample comprised 6,645 (77 dual care, 3,164 elderly care only, 148 childcare only, and 3,256 no care). In 2019, the adjusted odds ratio (95 % confidence interval [CI]) for lower well-being and higher loneliness in informal caregiving statuses (childcare only, elderly care only, and dual care) compared to no care was 1.38 (1.03–1.86), significant only for elderly care only. In 2021, elderly care only remained significant, with an odds ratio of 1.84 (1.15–2.97), while dual care was associated with lower well-being (1.55 (1.11–2.20) and higher loneliness (2.08 (1.24–3.49). Our study found that dual caregivers experienced greater declines in well-being and increased loneliness following the pandemic than non-caregivers. This highlights the importance of enhancing support for dual caregivers during current and future crises to prevent worsening well-being and loneliness.

Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics PlusVol. 1(4)
University of Tsukuba (JP), National Institute of Public Health (JP), National Center for Global Health and Medicine (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.