Diversity and inclusion have greater support than most Americans think

In a series of large-scale studies (N = 5,448) we show that Americans across many different demographic categories vastly underestimate their fellow Americans' support for diversity and inclusion. Trump voters were particularly inaccurate when their task was to estimate prevalent attitudes among Biden voters. Our results show that the degree of underestimation of others' support for diversity and inclusion predicts the frequency of conversations about diversity, reduced intentions to behave inclusively, and a smaller likelihood of confronting discrimination. Our last two studies (N = 723) demonstrate that it is possible to correct people's misperceptions through "social norms messaging," i.e., communications about statistics from national opinion polls highlighting that a majority of Americans are pro diversity. Our findings suggest that once people form accurate impressions of the high percentage of Americans who support diversity and inclusion, they will be more likely to be in favor of pro-diversity initiatives, behave more inclusively, and endorse policies aimed at reducing racial disparities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76761-8
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diversity and inclusion have greater support than most Americans think

Markus Bräuer, Naomi Isenberg
6 citations
Scientific Reports
Social and Intergroup Psychology
6.79
article

Diversity and inclusion have greater support than most Americans think

Markus Bräuer, Naomi Isenberg
article en
6 citations

Abstract

In a series of large-scale studies (N = 5,448) we show that Americans across many different demographic categories vastly underestimate their fellow Americans' support for diversity and inclusion. Trump voters were particularly inaccurate when their task was to estimate prevalent attitudes among Biden voters. Our results show that the degree of underestimation of others' support for diversity and inclusion predicts the frequency of conversations about diversity, reduced intentions to behave inclusively, and a smaller likelihood of confronting discrimination. Our last two studies (N = 723) demonstrate that it is possible to correct people's misperceptions through "social norms messaging," i.e., communications about statistics from national opinion polls highlighting that a majority of Americans are pro diversity. Our findings suggest that once people form accurate impressions of the high percentage of Americans who support diversity and inclusion, they will be more likely to be in favor of pro-diversity initiatives, behave more inclusively, and endorse policies aimed at reducing racial disparities.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Clackamas Community College (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
6.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Diversity and inclusion have greater support than most Americans think — Markus Bräuer, Naomi Isenberg · Scientific Reports (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS