Reward processing dominates the brain during feedback evaluation: Electrophysiological evidence

During reinforcement learning, people learn based on both positive and negative feedback. Researchers have revealed the reward positivity (RewP) that reflects positive feedback evaluation, however, no electrophysiological indicator has been found to explain negative feedback processing. In reinforcement learning, people would like to expect the positive feedback after a choice, which might explain why previous studies usually found neural responses for reward processing, while the negative feedback processing seems absent. However, no study has designed a task to separate positive and negative feedback processing to measure the corresponding electrophysiological responses. Thus, the present study designed gain processing-advantaged (GA) and loss processing-advantaged (LA) contexts using a modified gambling task to measure specific neural responses to gain processing and loss processing. Electroencephalography (EEG) data were processed using time-domain and time-frequency analyses. The results revealed the RewP and delta oscillation following gain feedback in the GA context, while no negativity or other components specific to loss processing was found, even in the loss condition of LA context. The current results indicate that reward processing dominates the brain during feedback evaluation, whereas loss processing can't be captured by electrophysiological signal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Research
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149337
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reward processing dominates the brain during feedback evaluation: Electrophysiological evidence

Robert Z. Qi, Ling Tong, Shiwei Jia, Li M. Li et al.
Brain Research
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Reward processing dominates the brain during feedback evaluation: Electrophysiological evidence

Robert Z. Qi, Ling Tong, Shiwei Jia, Li M. Li, Congcong Qi, Song Wenqi
article en

Abstract

During reinforcement learning, people learn based on both positive and negative feedback. Researchers have revealed the reward positivity (RewP) that reflects positive feedback evaluation, however, no electrophysiological indicator has been found to explain negative feedback processing. In reinforcement learning, people would like to expect the positive feedback after a choice, which might explain why previous studies usually found neural responses for reward processing, while the negative feedback processing seems absent. However, no study has designed a task to separate positive and negative feedback processing to measure the corresponding electrophysiological responses. Thus, the present study designed gain processing-advantaged (GA) and loss processing-advantaged (LA) contexts using a modified gambling task to measure specific neural responses to gain processing and loss processing. Electroencephalography (EEG) data were processed using time-domain and time-frequency analyses. The results revealed the RewP and delta oscillation following gain feedback in the GA context, while no negativity or other components specific to loss processing was found, even in the loss condition of LA context. The current results indicate that reward processing dominates the brain during feedback evaluation, whereas loss processing can't be captured by electrophysiological signal.

Brain ResearchVol. 1848
Shandong Normal University (CN), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.