From affirmation to concession

Abstract The Modern Chinese concessive connective kě shì (e.g., kàn shàngqù bù zěnmeyàng, kě shì chī qǐlái què tǐng bùcuò [‘it looks not so good, but it tastes quite good’]) did not develop from a clause-initial emphatic kě shì structure that has a pragmatic counter expectation meaning (e.g., kě shì tā shuōde [‘it was really she who said it’]), but from an affirmative response marker kě shì in Early Modern Chinese (e.g., kě shì ne, míng’er nǐ sòngwǒ shénme? [‘ quite right , what do you send me as gifts tomorrow?’]). Shì in the connective did not develop from a copula shì , but from an adjective shì meaning ‘right, true’ (e.g., rán, shì yě [‘right, it’s true ’]). The hypothesised pathway may be explained as the grammaticalisation of an affirmative response marker used in the context of token agreement, and may be adopted to account for the formation of an Old Chinese concessive connective rán (e.g., rán Zhèng wáng, zǐ yì yǒu bùlì yān [‘ but if Zheng State perishes, it serves you no good, either’]). It gives support to an extra-clausal source for the formation of a sentence connective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.21009.lon
Citations
28
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
77.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From affirmation to concession

Weihua Zhou, Haiping Long
28 citations
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
77.80
article

From affirmation to concession

Weihua Zhou, Haiping Long
article en
28 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Modern Chinese concessive connective kě shì (e.g., kàn shàngqù bù zěnmeyàng, kě shì chī qǐlái què tǐng bùcuò [‘it looks not so good, but it tastes quite good’]) did not develop from a clause-initial emphatic kě shì structure that has a pragmatic counter expectation meaning (e.g., kě shì tā shuōde [‘it was really she who said it’]), but from an affirmative response marker kě shì in Early Modern Chinese (e.g., kě shì ne, míng’er nǐ sòngwǒ shénme? [‘ quite right , what do you send me as gifts tomorrow?’]). Shì in the connective did not develop from a copula shì , but from an adjective shì meaning ‘right, true’ (e.g., rán, shì yě [‘right, it’s true ’]). The hypothesised pathway may be explained as the grammaticalisation of an affirmative response marker used in the context of token agreement, and may be adopted to account for the formation of an Old Chinese concessive connective rán (e.g., rán Zhèng wáng, zǐ yì yǒu bùlì yān [‘ but if Zheng State perishes, it serves you no good, either’]). It gives support to an extra-clausal source for the formation of a sentence connective.

Journal of Historical PragmaticsVol. 26(1)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), China Three Gorges University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
77.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.