Validating instrument to assess science literacy and independent learning skills in high school

Inadequate science literacy and independent learning hinder students' ability to analyze scientific information. This study aimed to develop and validate a measurement instrument to assess science literacy and independent learning skills among high school students. The instrument was piloted with 20 twelfth-grade students at SMAN 03 Kota Yogyakarta to assess its reliability and validity. The validated instrument was administered to 20 eleventh-grade students at the same school to identify the profiles of these two skills and explore their relationship in the context of the nervous system. The validity analysis demonstrated that both the science literacy and independent learning instruments exhibited strong validity. Pearson correlation analysis revealed that 20 items in the independent learning questionnaire were strongly correlated with the total score. Rasch analysis of the science literacy test indicated low infit mean square values, appropriate p-values, and high point biserial values, suggesting well-functioning items. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients for both instruments were excellent. The profile analysis revealed a discrepancy, with many students showing high independent learning levels but low science literacy scores on the nervous system topic. This gap suggests that even students capable of independent learning may face challenges in grasping specific scientific concepts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia)
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i3.34770
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating instrument to assess science literacy and independent learning skills in high school

Anggi Tias Pratama, P. Paidi, Bebi Ramalia Alfi
2 links
JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia)
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Validating instrument to assess science literacy and independent learning skills in high school

Anggi Tias Pratama, P. Paidi, Bebi Ramalia Alfi
article en

Abstract

Inadequate science literacy and independent learning hinder students' ability to analyze scientific information. This study aimed to develop and validate a measurement instrument to assess science literacy and independent learning skills among high school students. The instrument was piloted with 20 twelfth-grade students at SMAN 03 Kota Yogyakarta to assess its reliability and validity. The validated instrument was administered to 20 eleventh-grade students at the same school to identify the profiles of these two skills and explore their relationship in the context of the nervous system. The validity analysis demonstrated that both the science literacy and independent learning instruments exhibited strong validity. Pearson correlation analysis revealed that 20 items in the independent learning questionnaire were strongly correlated with the total score. Rasch analysis of the science literacy test indicated low infit mean square values, appropriate p-values, and high point biserial values, suggesting well-functioning items. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients for both instruments were excellent. The profile analysis revealed a discrepancy, with many students showing high independent learning levels but low science literacy scores on the nervous system topic. This gap suggests that even students capable of independent learning may face challenges in grasping specific scientific concepts.

JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia)Vol. 10(3)
Yogyakarta State University (ID)
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.