The Fifth Generation of Revolution Studies. Part I: When, Why, and How Did It Emerge

There are grounds for claiming that a new (‘fifth’) generation of revolution studies has emerged in the 21st century. It can be noted that the characteristics of this generation are as follows: a tendency toward a macro-level outlook, encompassing both historical and geographical dimensions, coupled with a propensity toward a systemic approach; study of distinct types of revolutionary processes, such as Mark Beissinger’s ‘urban civic revolutions’, and the pivotal revolutionary innovations, including the impact of new information technologies in recent revolutions; innovations regarding the factors and causes of revolutions and innovations in the analysis of the factors influencing the choice of revolutionary strategy and revolution outcomes; a special interest in the topic of revolutionary waves/‘the diffusion of revolution’; a strong understanding that armed and unarmed revolutionary events are characterized by significantly different factors, structure, and consequences; a focus on the study of unarmed revolutionary episodes/‘non-violent maximalist campaigns’; the use of global databases of revolutionary events; extensive use of modern methods of quantitative analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205241300596
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Fifth Generation of Revolution Studies. Part I: When, Why, and How Did It Emerge

Andrey Korotayev, Леонид Гринин, Vadim Ustyuzhanin, Egor Fain
4 citations
Critical Sociology
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
3.31
article

The Fifth Generation of Revolution Studies. Part I: When, Why, and How Did It Emerge

Andrey Korotayev, Леонид Гринин, Vadim Ustyuzhanin, Egor Fain
article en
4 citations

Abstract

There are grounds for claiming that a new (‘fifth’) generation of revolution studies has emerged in the 21st century. It can be noted that the characteristics of this generation are as follows: a tendency toward a macro-level outlook, encompassing both historical and geographical dimensions, coupled with a propensity toward a systemic approach; study of distinct types of revolutionary processes, such as Mark Beissinger’s ‘urban civic revolutions’, and the pivotal revolutionary innovations, including the impact of new information technologies in recent revolutions; innovations regarding the factors and causes of revolutions and innovations in the analysis of the factors influencing the choice of revolutionary strategy and revolution outcomes; a special interest in the topic of revolutionary waves/‘the diffusion of revolution’; a strong understanding that armed and unarmed revolutionary events are characterized by significantly different factors, structure, and consequences; a focus on the study of unarmed revolutionary episodes/‘non-violent maximalist campaigns’; the use of global databases of revolutionary events; extensive use of modern methods of quantitative analysis.

Critical SociologyVol. 51(2)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), Institute for African Studies (RU), Institute of Oriental Studies (RU)
Russian Science Foundation
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
3.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.