Counteracting the threats to DEI: The answer is accountability

The focal article authors (Follmer et al., 2024) highlight legislative initiatives that threaten diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) by eliminating programs that educate about minority populations, by reducing access to education and employment opportunities for minority groups, and by removing protections for minority groups.These efforts seem to be at odds with the needs of organizations that are increasingly employing and marketing to diverse populations, making implementing such programs all the more imperative (Opie & Washington, 2023).Although the authors note that the effects of legislative initiatives on DEI efforts are profound, these legislative efforts are largely focused on initiatives such as prioritizing diversity in hiring, developing employee resource groups, and creating diversity education programs, initiatives that researchers have categorized as nondiscrimination practices and resource practices (Leslie, 2019).One potential solution might be to rely on the third category of DEI initiatives researchers have identified: accountability practices.We believe that increasing accountability within DEI practices would help organizations counteract many of these threats to DEI practices in the current climate while also abiding by the law.The authors noted organizations have engaged in a wide variety of practices to promote diversity.In exploring the myriad practices organizations engage in to promote diversity, Leslie (2019) proposed a typology of DEI practices that divided DEI efforts into three broad categories: nondiscrimination practices, which are intended to remove bias from organizational processes (e.g., implicit bias training to improve selection); resources practices that allocate resources to underrepresented groups (e.g., establishing employee resource groups); and accountability practices which are practices that increase the monitoring of DEI initiatives and ensure organizations are responsible for their outcomes.Accountability practices involve efforts such as incorporating diversity goals into management systems, creating organizational goals for diversity, establishing a diversity manager or team to monitor diversity efforts, and creating grievance systems for employees who experience discrimination (Burnett & Aguinis, 2024).One essential component of accountability practices is gathering data to demonstrate that diversity programs are achieving their desired goals.As Leslie (2019) noted: "Whereas nondiscrimination and resource practices focus on the means used to achieve diversity goal progress, accountability practices focus on the end of diversity goal progress itself" (p.541).Researchers have noted the importance of accountability and accountability structures in the success of DEI initiatives (Burnett & Aguinis, 2024).Lerner and Tetlock (1999) define accountability as "the implicit or explicit expectation that one's actions may be called on to justify one's beliefs, feelings, and actions to others."Accountability theory argues that individuals are most inclined to restrict their own biases when their behavior is being observed (Dobbin et al., 2015).Accountability structures help ensure the success of DEI initiatives by drawing attention to individual behaviors and organizational actions that increase diversity and reduce discrimination

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2024.51
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Medical Coding and Health Information
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Counteracting the threats to DEI: The answer is accountability

Cody B. Cox, Michelle Nguyen
2 citations
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Medical Coding and Health Information
1.42
article

Counteracting the threats to DEI: The answer is accountability

Cody B. Cox, Michelle Nguyen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The focal article authors (Follmer et al., 2024) highlight legislative initiatives that threaten diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) by eliminating programs that educate about minority populations, by reducing access to education and employment opportunities for minority groups, and by removing protections for minority groups.These efforts seem to be at odds with the needs of organizations that are increasingly employing and marketing to diverse populations, making implementing such programs all the more imperative (Opie & Washington, 2023).Although the authors note that the effects of legislative initiatives on DEI efforts are profound, these legislative efforts are largely focused on initiatives such as prioritizing diversity in hiring, developing employee resource groups, and creating diversity education programs, initiatives that researchers have categorized as nondiscrimination practices and resource practices (Leslie, 2019).One potential solution might be to rely on the third category of DEI initiatives researchers have identified: accountability practices.We believe that increasing accountability within DEI practices would help organizations counteract many of these threats to DEI practices in the current climate while also abiding by the law.The authors noted organizations have engaged in a wide variety of practices to promote diversity.In exploring the myriad practices organizations engage in to promote diversity, Leslie (2019) proposed a typology of DEI practices that divided DEI efforts into three broad categories: nondiscrimination practices, which are intended to remove bias from organizational processes (e.g., implicit bias training to improve selection); resources practices that allocate resources to underrepresented groups (e.g., establishing employee resource groups); and accountability practices which are practices that increase the monitoring of DEI initiatives and ensure organizations are responsible for their outcomes.Accountability practices involve efforts such as incorporating diversity goals into management systems, creating organizational goals for diversity, establishing a diversity manager or team to monitor diversity efforts, and creating grievance systems for employees who experience discrimination (Burnett & Aguinis, 2024).One essential component of accountability practices is gathering data to demonstrate that diversity programs are achieving their desired goals.As Leslie (2019) noted: "Whereas nondiscrimination and resource practices focus on the means used to achieve diversity goal progress, accountability practices focus on the end of diversity goal progress itself" (p.541).Researchers have noted the importance of accountability and accountability structures in the success of DEI initiatives (Burnett & Aguinis, 2024).Lerner and Tetlock (1999) define accountability as "the implicit or explicit expectation that one's actions may be called on to justify one's beliefs, feelings, and actions to others."Accountability theory argues that individuals are most inclined to restrict their own biases when their behavior is being observed (Dobbin et al., 2015).Accountability structures help ensure the success of DEI initiatives by drawing attention to individual behaviors and organizational actions that increase diversity and reduce discrimination

Industrial and Organizational PsychologyVol. 17(4)
St. Mary's University, Texas (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Medical Coding and Health Information
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.