Small businesses, the labor market, and the industrialized world

In their research, Zhou et al. (2024) highlight small businesses to quantify the scientistpractitioner gap to the point that they suggest that the lack of attention to small businesses is a primary reason for its existence.Although we should acknowledge the presence and importance of the scientist-practitioner gap and the lack of research on small businesses, the conflation of the two problems is not ideal for understanding and addressing either one.To illustrate this, we can make a parallel argument about the lack of I-O research in nonindustrialized countries and the relative absence of I-O research on "workers."Existing I-O research is rarely generalized beyond the specific professional populations in formal economies of high-income countries, and few studies exist that even attempt research of this kind (Gloss et al., 2017).Arguably, and similar to small businesses, this concerns a significant part of the world and perhaps even a majority of its work settings.It has also been argued that samples in the I-O psychology literature do not reflect the labor market, and that the majority of workers are not represented (Bergman & Jean, 2016).Again, the small percentage that is represented in the literature reflects the reduced effect of I-O research on understanding the workplace more generally.In both of the above studies, the literature of I-O psychology does not broadly apply to the existing workplace environments in the world.The lack of research on small businesses both overlaps with and adds to this bias.The general bias in I-O research also affects research on small businesses.Identifying a specific but ubiquitous context that received relatively little attention helps to address biases in I-O research in a different way.A scientist-practitioner gap is served by addressing certain contexts as well as general biases, and depending on the researcher, one may be more attainable than the other.A study of the scientist-practitioner gap more generally requires a different approach where studies that do focus on a particular business or context, whether it is a small business or a larger organization, can be evaluated for their practical relevance for that type of industry.In addition, but separate from such a study, one should continue to criticize I-O researchers for using convenience samples that are predominantly taken from large organizations, located in the industrialized world, and that exclude the majority of the workers in the labor market. References

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2024.37
Primary Topic
Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Small businesses, the labor market, and the industrialized world

Alex de Voogt
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
article

Small businesses, the labor market, and the industrialized world

Alex de Voogt
article en

Abstract

In their research, Zhou et al. (2024) highlight small businesses to quantify the scientistpractitioner gap to the point that they suggest that the lack of attention to small businesses is a primary reason for its existence.Although we should acknowledge the presence and importance of the scientist-practitioner gap and the lack of research on small businesses, the conflation of the two problems is not ideal for understanding and addressing either one.To illustrate this, we can make a parallel argument about the lack of I-O research in nonindustrialized countries and the relative absence of I-O research on "workers."Existing I-O research is rarely generalized beyond the specific professional populations in formal economies of high-income countries, and few studies exist that even attempt research of this kind (Gloss et al., 2017).Arguably, and similar to small businesses, this concerns a significant part of the world and perhaps even a majority of its work settings.It has also been argued that samples in the I-O psychology literature do not reflect the labor market, and that the majority of workers are not represented (Bergman & Jean, 2016).Again, the small percentage that is represented in the literature reflects the reduced effect of I-O research on understanding the workplace more generally.In both of the above studies, the literature of I-O psychology does not broadly apply to the existing workplace environments in the world.The lack of research on small businesses both overlaps with and adds to this bias.The general bias in I-O research also affects research on small businesses.Identifying a specific but ubiquitous context that received relatively little attention helps to address biases in I-O research in a different way.A scientist-practitioner gap is served by addressing certain contexts as well as general biases, and depending on the researcher, one may be more attainable than the other.A study of the scientist-practitioner gap more generally requires a different approach where studies that do focus on a particular business or context, whether it is a small business or a larger organization, can be evaluated for their practical relevance for that type of industry.In addition, but separate from such a study, one should continue to criticize I-O researchers for using convenience samples that are predominantly taken from large organizations, located in the industrialized world, and that exclude the majority of the workers in the labor market. References

Industrial and Organizational PsychologyVol. 17(4)
Drew University (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.