Let me in: Building an I-O bridge that combats the subtle redlining of the scientist–practitioner gap

Amid discussions of the scientist–practitioner gap in I-O, it is often assumed that there is a single bridge to cross that has two parties on either side: academic researchers and practitioners. However, whether intentionally or not, small businesses have largely been neglected in efforts to fortify the bridge between the aforementioned parties, leaving the route between academic research and small businesses poorly maintained. As such, our commentary will focus on various aspects of the points of invitation for debate provided in Zhou et al. (Reference Zhou, Campbell and Fyffe2024), namely the prevalence of the scientist–practitioner gap between I-O researchers and small business owners and the access small businesses have to academic research insights. Although all authors on this paper are I-O-trained researchers working in and contributing to the academic field, two coauthors are also small business owners, adding nuanced richness to this conversation. Further, as diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) researchers, we consider equitable access to the knowledge generated by academic research as a key principle to our work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2024.34
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Research Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Let me in: Building an I-O bridge that combats the subtle redlining of the scientist–practitioner gap

Joan Randall, Aileen Taylor, Henri T. Maindidze, Laura Brooks Dueland
1 citations
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Health and Medical Research Impacts
0.54
article

Let me in: Building an I-O bridge that combats the subtle redlining of the scientist–practitioner gap

Joan Randall, Aileen Taylor, Henri T. Maindidze, Laura Brooks Dueland
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Amid discussions of the scientist–practitioner gap in I-O, it is often assumed that there is a single bridge to cross that has two parties on either side: academic researchers and practitioners. However, whether intentionally or not, small businesses have largely been neglected in efforts to fortify the bridge between the aforementioned parties, leaving the route between academic research and small businesses poorly maintained. As such, our commentary will focus on various aspects of the points of invitation for debate provided in Zhou et al. (Reference Zhou, Campbell and Fyffe2024), namely the prevalence of the scientist–practitioner gap between I-O researchers and small business owners and the access small businesses have to academic research insights. Although all authors on this paper are I-O-trained researchers working in and contributing to the academic field, two coauthors are also small business owners, adding nuanced richness to this conversation. Further, as diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) researchers, we consider equitable access to the knowledge generated by academic research as a key principle to our work.

Industrial and Organizational PsychologyVol. 17(4)
University of Nebraska at Omaha (US), Portland State University (US), Buckland & Taylor (Canada) (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Health and Medical Research Impacts
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.