Fatigue Failure of Adhesive Joints in Fiber-Reinforced Composite Material Under Step/Variable Amplitude Loading—A Critical Literature Review

Most fatigue-loading research has concentrated on constant-amplitude tests, which seldom represent actual service conditions. Because of the significant time and expense associated with variable-amplitude experiments, researchers often employ block/step-loading tests to evaluate the effects of variable-amplitude loading. These tests utilize various sequences of low-to-high and high-to-low loads to simulate real-world scenarios. Empirical investigations have shown inconsistencies in the damage accumulation under different load sequences. Although literature reviews exist for simulation and experimental methods, there is limited research examining the impact of step/variable-amplitude loading on adhesive joints in composite materials. This review aims to address this gap by comprehensively analyzing the effects of load sequence and block loading on fatigue damage progression in fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Additionally, the applicability of various step-loading fatigue damage accumulation models to adhesive materials is evaluated through numerical simulation to study its suitability in predicting fatigue failure. This review also explores recent theoretical advancements in this field over the past few years, examining more than 100 fatigue damage accumulation models categorized into seven subcategories: (i) linear damage rules, (ii) nonlinear damage curve and two-stage linearization models, (iii) life curve modification models, (iv) models based on crack growth concepts, (v) continuum damage mechanics-based models, (vi) material degradation models, and (vii) energy-based models. Finally, numerical simulations using the most common nonlinear cumulative fatigue damage accumulation models were conducted to predict fatigue failure in adhesively bonded joints under four step-loading tests, and the results were compared with the experimental data. Numerical simulations revealed the need and scope of further development of a fatigue failure model under step/variable loading. This comprehensive review offers valuable insights into the complex nature of fatigue failure in adhesive joints under variable loading conditions and highlights current state-of-the-art nonlinear fatigue damage accumulation models for adhesive materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Composites Science
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8110477
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fatigue Failure of Adhesive Joints in Fiber-Reinforced Composite Material Under Step/Variable Amplitude Loading—A Critical Literature Review

Ala Tabiei, Abinash Patro
3 citations
Journal of Composites Science
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
0.81
article

Fatigue Failure of Adhesive Joints in Fiber-Reinforced Composite Material Under Step/Variable Amplitude Loading—A Critical Literature Review

Ala Tabiei, Abinash Patro
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Most fatigue-loading research has concentrated on constant-amplitude tests, which seldom represent actual service conditions. Because of the significant time and expense associated with variable-amplitude experiments, researchers often employ block/step-loading tests to evaluate the effects of variable-amplitude loading. These tests utilize various sequences of low-to-high and high-to-low loads to simulate real-world scenarios. Empirical investigations have shown inconsistencies in the damage accumulation under different load sequences. Although literature reviews exist for simulation and experimental methods, there is limited research examining the impact of step/variable-amplitude loading on adhesive joints in composite materials. This review aims to address this gap by comprehensively analyzing the effects of load sequence and block loading on fatigue damage progression in fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Additionally, the applicability of various step-loading fatigue damage accumulation models to adhesive materials is evaluated through numerical simulation to study its suitability in predicting fatigue failure. This review also explores recent theoretical advancements in this field over the past few years, examining more than 100 fatigue damage accumulation models categorized into seven subcategories: (i) linear damage rules, (ii) nonlinear damage curve and two-stage linearization models, (iii) life curve modification models, (iv) models based on crack growth concepts, (v) continuum damage mechanics-based models, (vi) material degradation models, and (vii) energy-based models. Finally, numerical simulations using the most common nonlinear cumulative fatigue damage accumulation models were conducted to predict fatigue failure in adhesively bonded joints under four step-loading tests, and the results were compared with the experimental data. Numerical simulations revealed the need and scope of further development of a fatigue failure model under step/variable loading. This comprehensive review offers valuable insights into the complex nature of fatigue failure in adhesive joints under variable loading conditions and highlights current state-of-the-art nonlinear fatigue damage accumulation models for adhesive materials.

Journal of Composites ScienceVol. 8(11)
Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté (FR), University of Cincinnati (US)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.