Gypsum: From the Equilibrium to the Growth Shapes—Theory and Experiments

The gypsum crystals (CaSO4·2H2O) crystallizes in a low symmetry system (monoclinic) and shows a marked layered structure along with a perfect cleavage parallel to the {010} faces. Owing to its widespread occurrence, as a single or twinned crystal, here the gypsum equilibrium (E.S.) and growth shapes (G.S.) have been re-visited. In making the distinction among E.S. and G.S., in the present work, the basic difference between epitaxy and homo-taxy is clearly evidenced. Gypsum has also been a fruitful occasion to recollect the general rules concerning either contact or penetration twins, for free growing and for twinned crystals nucleating onto pre-existing substrates. Both geometric and crystal growth aspects have been considered as well, by unifying theory and experiments of crystallography and crystal growth through the intervention of βadh, the physical quantity representing the specific adhesion energy between gypsum and other phases. Hence, the adhesion energy allowed us to systematically use the Dupré’s formula. In the final part of the paper, peculiar attention has been paid to sediments (or solution growth) where the crystal size is very small, in order to offer a new simple way to afford classical (CNT) and non-classical nucleation (NCNT) theories, both ruling two quantities commonly used in the industrial crystallization: the total induction times (tindtotal) and crystal size distribution (CSD).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minerals
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/min14111175
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gypsum: From the Equilibrium to the Growth Shapes—Theory and Experiments

Stefano Ghignone, Marco Bruno, Dino Aquilano
3 citations
Minerals
Planetary Science and Exploration
0.99
article

Gypsum: From the Equilibrium to the Growth Shapes—Theory and Experiments

Stefano Ghignone, Marco Bruno, Dino Aquilano
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The gypsum crystals (CaSO4·2H2O) crystallizes in a low symmetry system (monoclinic) and shows a marked layered structure along with a perfect cleavage parallel to the {010} faces. Owing to its widespread occurrence, as a single or twinned crystal, here the gypsum equilibrium (E.S.) and growth shapes (G.S.) have been re-visited. In making the distinction among E.S. and G.S., in the present work, the basic difference between epitaxy and homo-taxy is clearly evidenced. Gypsum has also been a fruitful occasion to recollect the general rules concerning either contact or penetration twins, for free growing and for twinned crystals nucleating onto pre-existing substrates. Both geometric and crystal growth aspects have been considered as well, by unifying theory and experiments of crystallography and crystal growth through the intervention of βadh, the physical quantity representing the specific adhesion energy between gypsum and other phases. Hence, the adhesion energy allowed us to systematically use the Dupré’s formula. In the final part of the paper, peculiar attention has been paid to sediments (or solution growth) where the crystal size is very small, in order to offer a new simple way to afford classical (CNT) and non-classical nucleation (NCNT) theories, both ruling two quantities commonly used in the industrial crystallization: the total induction times (tindtotal) and crystal size distribution (CSD).

MineralsVol. 14(11)
University of Turin (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Planetary Science and Exploration
0.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.