Study on the Hydrodynamic Effects of Bridge Piers Under Velocity-Type Pulse Ground Motion Based on Different Characteristic Periods

This study was based on a target spectrum (GB183062015) and synthesized different characteristic periods, pulse ground motions, and non-pulse ground motions utilizing EQsignal v1.2.1 software. It also investigated the dynamic behaviors of bridge piers in seismic motions with varying characteristic periods, pulse and non-pulse effects, and the influence of 0 m and 10 m water depths. The findings indicated that the peak acceleration and stress behaviors vary significantly under different characteristic periods of ground motion. The maximum error in peak acceleration behavior of a bridge pier under ground motions of varying characteristic periods is 19.25%, while the maximum error in peak stress response is 11.35%. The acceleration and stress behaviors of a bridge pier under pulse ground motion action are more considerable than those under non-pulse seismic motion action. When the characteristic period is 0.40 s, the maximum error in peak acceleration of the bridge pier structure under pulse seismic motion and non-pulse seismic motion action is 86.08%, with the maximum error of the peak stress reaches 80.68%. The existence of water serves to minimize the natural frequency of the bridge pier. The pulse effects result in a maximum error of 40.49% for the peak acceleration and a maximum discrepancy of 323.08% for the peak stress of the bridge pier. The hydrodynamic effects result in a maximum error of 33.51% for the acceleration peak and 12.90% for the stress peak of the bridge pier. The effect of the pulse symptoms on the dynamic behavior of the bridge pier is considerably more pronounced than that of the hydrodynamic effects, with an intricate and complex influencing mechanism. In bridge flood protection and seismic design and optimization, it is essential to consider the impact of pulse seismic motion with varying characteristic periods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210709
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on the Hydrodynamic Effects of Bridge Piers Under Velocity-Type Pulse Ground Motion Based on Different Characteristic Periods

Gaojie Yun, Chunguang Liu
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
0.26
article

Study on the Hydrodynamic Effects of Bridge Piers Under Velocity-Type Pulse Ground Motion Based on Different Characteristic Periods

Gaojie Yun, Chunguang Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study was based on a target spectrum (GB183062015) and synthesized different characteristic periods, pulse ground motions, and non-pulse ground motions utilizing EQsignal v1.2.1 software. It also investigated the dynamic behaviors of bridge piers in seismic motions with varying characteristic periods, pulse and non-pulse effects, and the influence of 0 m and 10 m water depths. The findings indicated that the peak acceleration and stress behaviors vary significantly under different characteristic periods of ground motion. The maximum error in peak acceleration behavior of a bridge pier under ground motions of varying characteristic periods is 19.25%, while the maximum error in peak stress response is 11.35%. The acceleration and stress behaviors of a bridge pier under pulse ground motion action are more considerable than those under non-pulse seismic motion action. When the characteristic period is 0.40 s, the maximum error in peak acceleration of the bridge pier structure under pulse seismic motion and non-pulse seismic motion action is 86.08%, with the maximum error of the peak stress reaches 80.68%. The existence of water serves to minimize the natural frequency of the bridge pier. The pulse effects result in a maximum error of 40.49% for the peak acceleration and a maximum discrepancy of 323.08% for the peak stress of the bridge pier. The hydrodynamic effects result in a maximum error of 33.51% for the acceleration peak and 12.90% for the stress peak of the bridge pier. The effect of the pulse symptoms on the dynamic behavior of the bridge pier is considerably more pronounced than that of the hydrodynamic effects, with an intricate and complex influencing mechanism. In bridge flood protection and seismic design and optimization, it is essential to consider the impact of pulse seismic motion with varying characteristic periods.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(22)
Dalian University of Technology (CN), Zhejiang University of Water Resource and Electric Power (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
0.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.