Tinjauan Yuridis Suara Sebagai Merek dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis

Voice is one of the signs in a brand. Voice comes in in non-traditional brands. Sound marks are listed in Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications. In the arrangements, there is still confusion regarding this matter, so that very few votes are registered in its implementation. A small number of vote registrations really creates problems of confusion in registration. This research uses normative research through a statutory and regulatory approach and a comparative approach. The results obtained from the research are that there are obstacles in registering sound as a brand so that sound brands are refused registration. This problem concerns the bad faith carried out by the registrant. Comparison of the regulation of sound as a brand in Australia and Indonesia has similarities and differences in registration. Australia has regulated sounds that cannot be registered and regulates the duration of sounds that will be branded. while Indonesia has not yet regulated this.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pemuliaan Keadilan
Published
2024-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62383/pk.v1i4.94
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tinjauan Yuridis Suara Sebagai Merek dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis

Kristina Sanca Ngunas, Made Gede Subha Karma Resen
Pemuliaan Keadilan
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Tinjauan Yuridis Suara Sebagai Merek dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis

Kristina Sanca Ngunas, Made Gede Subha Karma Resen
article en

Abstract

Voice is one of the signs in a brand. Voice comes in in non-traditional brands. Sound marks are listed in Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications. In the arrangements, there is still confusion regarding this matter, so that very few votes are registered in its implementation. A small number of vote registrations really creates problems of confusion in registration. This research uses normative research through a statutory and regulatory approach and a comparative approach. The results obtained from the research are that there are obstacles in registering sound as a brand so that sound brands are refused registration. This problem concerns the bad faith carried out by the registrant. Comparison of the regulation of sound as a brand in Australia and Indonesia has similarities and differences in registration. Australia has regulated sounds that cannot be registered and regulates the duration of sounds that will be branded. while Indonesia has not yet regulated this.

Pemuliaan KeadilanVol. 1(4)
Udayana University (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tinjauan Yuridis Suara Sebagai Merek dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis — Kristina Sanca Ngunas, Made Gede Subha Karma Resen · Pemuliaan Keadilan (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS