Adaptive parameter selection in nudging based data assimilation

Data assimilation combines (imperfect) knowledge of a flow’s physical laws with (noisy, time-lagged, and otherwise imperfect) observations to produce a more accurate prediction of flow statistics. Assimilation by nudging (from 1964), while non-optimal, is easy to implement and its analysis is clear and well-established. Nudging’s uniform in time accuracy has even been established under conditions on the nudging parameter χ and the density of observational locations, H , Larios et al. (2019). One remaining issue is that nudging requires the user to select a key parameter. The conditions required for this parameter, derived through á priori (worst case) analysis are severe (Section 2.1 herein) and far beyond those found to be effective in computational experience. One resolution, developed herein, is self-adaptive parameter selection. This report develops, analyzes, tests, and compares two methods of self-adaptation of nudging parameters. One combines analysis and response to local flow behavior. The other is based only on response to flow behavior. The comparison finds both are easily implemented and yields effective values of the nudging parameter much smaller than those of á priori analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2024.117526
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptive parameter selection in nudging based data assimilation

Rui Fang, Aytekin Çıbık, William Layton, Farjana Siddiqua
3 citations
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
1.13
article

Adaptive parameter selection in nudging based data assimilation

Rui Fang, Aytekin Çıbık, William Layton, Farjana Siddiqua
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Data assimilation combines (imperfect) knowledge of a flow’s physical laws with (noisy, time-lagged, and otherwise imperfect) observations to produce a more accurate prediction of flow statistics. Assimilation by nudging (from 1964), while non-optimal, is easy to implement and its analysis is clear and well-established. Nudging’s uniform in time accuracy has even been established under conditions on the nudging parameter χ and the density of observational locations, H , Larios et al. (2019). One remaining issue is that nudging requires the user to select a key parameter. The conditions required for this parameter, derived through á priori (worst case) analysis are severe (Section 2.1 herein) and far beyond those found to be effective in computational experience. One resolution, developed herein, is self-adaptive parameter selection. This report develops, analyzes, tests, and compares two methods of self-adaptation of nudging parameters. One combines analysis and response to local flow behavior. The other is based only on response to flow behavior. The comparison finds both are easily implemented and yields effective values of the nudging parameter much smaller than those of á priori analysis.

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and EngineeringVol. 433
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Gazi University (TR)
National Science Foundation, Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.