Parallel Imports: The Principle of Domestic Exhaustion of Trademark Rights and the Strict Non-infringement Exception

Abstract: With the development of globalization, parallel importation has been one of the efficient instruments to promote free trade worldwide. However, the trademark protection involved in parallel importation is complex as it concerns many elements. There is no consensus among countries on the legal nature of parallel imports. This essay comprehensively applies the case law rules, the comparative research rules, the literature analysis and the historical analysis method, analyzing reasons for the dilemma of parallel imports and different postures of countries and regions towards it. Some countries oppose parallel importers based on the theory of domestic exhaustion of trademark rights, while other supports the act for the theory of international exhaustion of trademark rights. Then the essay compares different legal measures taken by the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom and China in the face of parallel imports, and finally concludes that China should adhere to the principle of domestic exhaustion of trademark rights and the strict non-infringement exception for the balancing of private rights and public interests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/65/2024mu0043
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parallel Imports: The Principle of Domestic Exhaustion of Trademark Rights and the Strict Non-infringement Exception

Jie Guo
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Intellectual Property Law
article

Parallel Imports: The Principle of Domestic Exhaustion of Trademark Rights and the Strict Non-infringement Exception

Jie Guo
article en

Abstract

Abstract: With the development of globalization, parallel importation has been one of the efficient instruments to promote free trade worldwide. However, the trademark protection involved in parallel importation is complex as it concerns many elements. There is no consensus among countries on the legal nature of parallel imports. This essay comprehensively applies the case law rules, the comparative research rules, the literature analysis and the historical analysis method, analyzing reasons for the dilemma of parallel imports and different postures of countries and regions towards it. Some countries oppose parallel importers based on the theory of domestic exhaustion of trademark rights, while other supports the act for the theory of international exhaustion of trademark rights. Then the essay compares different legal measures taken by the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom and China in the face of parallel imports, and finally concludes that China should adhere to the principle of domestic exhaustion of trademark rights and the strict non-infringement exception for the balancing of private rights and public interests.

Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public MediaVol. 65(1)
East China University of Political Science and Law (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Intellectual Property Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.