Insights into large carnivore populations in Uganda: A participatory survey of lions, leopards, and hyenas using spatial capture-recapture

Monitoring wildlife populations at scale is fraught with logistical and resource constraints. Despite this, estimating wildlife population state variables and vital rates remains crucial for science, and to assess conservation investment and effort. The veracity and transparency of results also helps prevent politicization of wildlife populations. In Uganda, robust estimates of carnivore population size are rare in the literature. To overcome a near two-decade long data gap we initiated a survey of African lions, leopards, and spotted hyenas with the Uganda Wildlife Authority across six important protected areas. Surveys were conducted within a spatial capture-recapture framework, the industry gold-standard for monitoring carnivore populations. For lions, we used unstructured spatial sampling protocols (in the form of vehicle-based searches), while for leopards, and spotted hyenas we deployed camera traps. Our protocols were designed to obtain unambiguous individual identification photographs. This large-scale effort involved data collection by >100 local conservation stakeholders (including lodge guides, trophy hunters, university students, and government rangers). Locally extinct in three areas, we show lion numbers are precariously low in two of three sites where they still occur (Queen Elizabeth abundance=39.72, Posterior standard deviation (PSD)=7.96; Kidepo Valley abundance=22.23, PSD=11.67). Murchison Falls was identified as Uganda’s lion stronghold with an estimate of ∼240 individuals (PSD=34) and average park-wide densities of 7.43 individuals/100 km 2 (PSD=1.05). Leopard densities were highest in Lake Mburo and Murchison Falls. In Murchison they reach some of the highest densities in Africa (14.06 individuals/100 km 2 , PSD=2.65). Spotted hyena densities were high compared to lions (range=6.15–45.31 individuals/100 km 2 ), except in Lake Mburo where densities were markedly lower (park abundance=23 individuals in 370 km 2 , PSD=5.26). Our work has critical policy implications, and forms the foundation of the new Strategic Action Plan for Large Carnivore Conservation in Uganda (2023–2033). It also illustrates how cutting-edge, transparent and collaborative science, implemented by multiple wildlife conservation stakeholders can help gauge the conservation status of their wildlife resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Conservation
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03312
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insights into large carnivore populations in Uganda: A participatory survey of lions, leopards, and hyenas using spatial capture-recapture

Hamish McCallum, Christos Astaras, Anna P. Crysell, Sophia Jingo et al.
3 citations
Global Ecology and Conservation
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.38
article

Insights into large carnivore populations in Uganda: A participatory survey of lions, leopards, and hyenas using spatial capture-recapture

Hamish McCallum, Christos Astaras, Anna P. Crysell, Sophia Jingo, Christopher J. O’Bryan, Aggrey Rwetsiba, Tutilo Mudumba, Arjun M. Gopalaswamy, Ralph Schenk, Peter A. Lindsey, SD Ling, Nicholas B. Elliot, Mustafa Nsubuga, A. M. Langley, Ana Martiele Engelmann, Ludwig Siefert, Innocent Komakech, Robert Kityo, Dinal Samarasinghe, Alexander Braczkowski, Eric Sande, Keren S. Pereira, Duan Biggs, Bosco Atukwatse, Orin Cornille, Kevin J. James, Luke Gibson, Peter Luhonda, Lilian Namukose, Silvan Musobozi, Gilbert Drileyo, Brenda Asimwe, Michael Cima, Patrick Okello, Jimmy Kisembo, Herbert Kigongo, Philipp Kiboneka, Praveen Moman, Jonath Omwesigye, Kris Debref, Daniel Tiromwe, Samuel Loware, Nicholas Nuwaijuka, Nasulu Muzanganda, Saswata Hore, David Gumisiriza, Richard Ojok, Fred Kakaire, Denise Namugenyi, James Kalyewa
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Monitoring wildlife populations at scale is fraught with logistical and resource constraints. Despite this, estimating wildlife population state variables and vital rates remains crucial for science, and to assess conservation investment and effort. The veracity and transparency of results also helps prevent politicization of wildlife populations. In Uganda, robust estimates of carnivore population size are rare in the literature. To overcome a near two-decade long data gap we initiated a survey of African lions, leopards, and spotted hyenas with the Uganda Wildlife Authority across six important protected areas. Surveys were conducted within a spatial capture-recapture framework, the industry gold-standard for monitoring carnivore populations. For lions, we used unstructured spatial sampling protocols (in the form of vehicle-based searches), while for leopards, and spotted hyenas we deployed camera traps. Our protocols were designed to obtain unambiguous individual identification photographs. This large-scale effort involved data collection by >100 local conservation stakeholders (including lodge guides, trophy hunters, university students, and government rangers). Locally extinct in three areas, we show lion numbers are precariously low in two of three sites where they still occur (Queen Elizabeth abundance=39.72, Posterior standard deviation (PSD)=7.96; Kidepo Valley abundance=22.23, PSD=11.67). Murchison Falls was identified as Uganda’s lion stronghold with an estimate of ∼240 individuals (PSD=34) and average park-wide densities of 7.43 individuals/100 km 2 (PSD=1.05). Leopard densities were highest in Lake Mburo and Murchison Falls. In Murchison they reach some of the highest densities in Africa (14.06 individuals/100 km 2 , PSD=2.65). Spotted hyena densities were high compared to lions (range=6.15–45.31 individuals/100 km 2 ), except in Lake Mburo where densities were markedly lower (park abundance=23 individuals in 370 km 2 , PSD=5.26). Our work has critical policy implications, and forms the foundation of the new Strategic Action Plan for Large Carnivore Conservation in Uganda (2023–2033). It also illustrates how cutting-edge, transparent and collaborative science, implemented by multiple wildlife conservation stakeholders can help gauge the conservation status of their wildlife resources.

Global Ecology and ConservationVol. 56
Assam Don Bosco University (IN), Griffith University (AU), Ohio Department of Natural Resources (US), CAB International (GB), Kenya Wildlife Service (KE), The University of Queensland (AU), Northern Arizona University (US), Safe Work Australia (AU), IP Australia (AU), Uganda Wildlife Authority (UG), Busitema University (UG), Kampala University (UG), Maastricht University (NL), Metropolitan International University (UG), Wildlife Conservation Society Uganda (UG), Makerere University (UG), Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.