Quantifying the Pulmonary Risks of Volcanic Gas Inhalation: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Volcanic eruptions release a complex mixture of gases and particulate matter, posing significant respiratory health risks. This meta-analysis aims to quantify the association between volcanic gas inhalation and adverse pulmonary effects. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published between 2013 and 2024 investigating the respiratory effects of volcanic gas exposure. Studies reporting quantitative data on lung function, respiratory symptoms, or disease prevalence were included. Random-effect models were used to pool effect estimates, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results: Six studies (n = 2,215 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Volcanic gas exposure was associated with a significant decrease in FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.55, 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.42, I² = 51%), increased prevalence of asthma (odds ratio [OR] = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.84 to 5.96, I² = 76%), and chronic bronchitis (OR = 2.86, 95% CI: 1.97 to 4.15, I² =0%). Subgroup analysis revealed a stronger association between gas exposure and respiratory effects in children and individuals with pre-existing lung conditions. Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides compelling evidence that volcanic gas inhalation is detrimental to respiratory health. Public health interventions should prioritize vulnerable populations during and after volcanic eruptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioscientia Medicina Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm.v9i2.1185
Primary Topic
Disaster Response and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the Pulmonary Risks of Volcanic Gas Inhalation: A Meta-Analysis

Yessy Susanty Sabri, Septriana Putri
Bioscientia Medicina Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research
Disaster Response and Management
article

Quantifying the Pulmonary Risks of Volcanic Gas Inhalation: A Meta-Analysis

Yessy Susanty Sabri, Septriana Putri
article en

Abstract

Background: Volcanic eruptions release a complex mixture of gases and particulate matter, posing significant respiratory health risks. This meta-analysis aims to quantify the association between volcanic gas inhalation and adverse pulmonary effects. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published between 2013 and 2024 investigating the respiratory effects of volcanic gas exposure. Studies reporting quantitative data on lung function, respiratory symptoms, or disease prevalence were included. Random-effect models were used to pool effect estimates, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results: Six studies (n = 2,215 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Volcanic gas exposure was associated with a significant decrease in FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.55, 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.42, I² = 51%), increased prevalence of asthma (odds ratio [OR] = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.84 to 5.96, I² = 76%), and chronic bronchitis (OR = 2.86, 95% CI: 1.97 to 4.15, I² =0%). Subgroup analysis revealed a stronger association between gas exposure and respiratory effects in children and individuals with pre-existing lung conditions. Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides compelling evidence that volcanic gas inhalation is detrimental to respiratory health. Public health interventions should prioritize vulnerable populations during and after volcanic eruptions.

Bioscientia Medicina Journal of Biomedicine and Translational ResearchVol. 9(2)
Andalas University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Disaster Response and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.