Application of neural networks for determining the parameters of PVT-models used in solving hydrodynamic modeling problems

The article presents an overview of the application of machine learning models for problems of modeling the phase state of hydrocarbon systems. Determination of the state of a hydrocarbon system is possible in the presence of nonhydrocarbon components when performing hydrodynamic calculations on multiphase models. Such calculations are in demand when solving problems of both forecasting and adapting models to actual development data. It is shown that when adjusting models to actual data, the accuracy of reproducing laboratory experiments is in some cases higher than when using equations of state. But in some cases, the use of neural networks turns out to be useless. For relatively “simple” fluid systems, an increase in the complexity of the tool used does not provide an increase in accuracy compared to simple regression models. Another problem is the lack of a working tool that would completely replace the use of equations of state to assess the state of a fluid model when performing hydrodynamic calculations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Actual Problems of Oil and Gas
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29222/ipng.2078-5712.2024-15-3.art1
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of neural networks for determining the parameters of PVT-models used in solving hydrodynamic modeling problems

D.P. Anikeev, E.S. Anikeeva
Actual Problems of Oil and Gas
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
article

Application of neural networks for determining the parameters of PVT-models used in solving hydrodynamic modeling problems

D.P. Anikeev, E.S. Anikeeva
article en

Abstract

The article presents an overview of the application of machine learning models for problems of modeling the phase state of hydrocarbon systems. Determination of the state of a hydrocarbon system is possible in the presence of nonhydrocarbon components when performing hydrodynamic calculations on multiphase models. Such calculations are in demand when solving problems of both forecasting and adapting models to actual development data. It is shown that when adjusting models to actual data, the accuracy of reproducing laboratory experiments is in some cases higher than when using equations of state. But in some cases, the use of neural networks turns out to be useless. For relatively “simple” fluid systems, an increase in the complexity of the tool used does not provide an increase in accuracy compared to simple regression models. Another problem is the lack of a working tool that would completely replace the use of equations of state to assess the state of a fluid model when performing hydrodynamic calculations.

Actual Problems of Oil and GasVol. 15(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.