Are solidarity and identification as people of color distinct? Validating new measures across Asian, Black, Latino, and Multiracial Americans

Abstract Mounting U.S. research suggests many non-White individuals feel solidarity with, and identify as, people of color (PoC). Yet measurement limitations prevent scholars from testing whether these constructs are empirically different. We explain why these concepts diverge and evaluate our claims with an expanded battery of measures across U.S. Asian, Black, Latino, and Multiracial adults ( N = 3402). Using multi-group confirmatory factor analysis, we show these items capture related but distinct concepts among PoC ( configural invariance ). We then establish that these items uniformly measure each construct across PoC groups ( metric invariance ), with mean level differences validly reflecting actual heterogeneity between groups, rather than measurement artifacts ( scalar invariance ). Finally, consistent with our conceptualization, we show that solidarity among PoC mediates the association between PoC identification and support for policies that implicate various communities of color. We end with practical advice for using these items in surveys of racially diverse populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Science Research and Methods
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2024.61
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are solidarity and identification as people of color distinct? Validating new measures across Asian, Black, Latino, and Multiracial Americans

Efrén O. Pérez, Linda R. Tropp, Tatishe Nteta, Seth Goldman et al.
9 citations
Political Science Research and Methods
Social and Intergroup Psychology
10.19
article

Are solidarity and identification as people of color distinct? Validating new measures across Asian, Black, Latino, and Multiracial Americans

Efrén O. Pérez, Linda R. Tropp, Tatishe Nteta, Seth Goldman, Yuen J. Huo
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract Mounting U.S. research suggests many non-White individuals feel solidarity with, and identify as, people of color (PoC). Yet measurement limitations prevent scholars from testing whether these constructs are empirically different. We explain why these concepts diverge and evaluate our claims with an expanded battery of measures across U.S. Asian, Black, Latino, and Multiracial adults ( N = 3402). Using multi-group confirmatory factor analysis, we show these items capture related but distinct concepts among PoC ( configural invariance ). We then establish that these items uniformly measure each construct across PoC groups ( metric invariance ), with mean level differences validly reflecting actual heterogeneity between groups, rather than measurement artifacts ( scalar invariance ). Finally, consistent with our conceptualization, we show that solidarity among PoC mediates the association between PoC identification and support for policies that implicate various communities of color. We end with practical advice for using these items in surveys of racially diverse populations.

Political Science Research and MethodsVol. 13(4)
University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), UCLA Health (US)
Russell Sage Foundation
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
10.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.